coming and going rule (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

coming and going rule in North Carolina

6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Puett v. Bahnson Co. green
nc · 1950
2 sentences

2003Puett v. Bahnson Co. , 231 N.C. 711 , 58 S.E.2d 633 (1950).

2003Puett v. Bahnson Co. , 231 N.C. 711 , 58 S.E.2d 633 (1950).

22001–2003
Pollock v. Reeves Bros., Inc. green
nc · 1985
1 sentence

2011The North Carolina Supreme Court has held "when a superior directs a subordinate employee to go on an errand or perform some duty beyond his normal duties, an injury sustained in the course of that task is compensable." Pollock v. Reeves Bros., Inc . 313 N.C. 287 , 294 (1985).

12011–2011
Arp v. Parkdale Mills, Inc. green
ncctapp · 2002
1 sentence

2010Arp v. Parkdale Mills, Inc. , 150 N.C.

12010–2010
Hunt v. Tender Loving Care Home Care Agency, Inc. green
ncctapp · 2002
1 sentence

2005Hunt v. Tender Loving Care, 153 N.C.

12005–2005
Massey v. . Board of Education green
nc · 1933
2 sentences

2005Massey v. Board of Education, 204 N.C. 193 , 167 S.E. 695 (1933). . . . . 4. . . . [P]laintiff's accident does not fall under the special errand exception to the coming and going rule.

2005Massey v. Board of Education, 204 N.C. 193 , 167 S.E. 695 (1933). . . . . 4. . . . [P]laintiff's accident does not fall under the special errand exception to the coming and going rule.

12005–2005
Ross v. Young Supply Co. green
ncctapp · 1984
1 sentence

2001Ross v. Young Supply Co., 71 N.C.

12001–2001

Where else courts name it

OH 69 (1998–2025) TX 26 (1986–2026) PA 12 (1986–2024) ID 9 (1986–2015) CA 8 (1969–2020) NC 6 (2001–2011) CT 5 (2000–2018) FL 5 (1990–2024) UT 5 (1995–2008) KY 5 (2013–2023) WY 4 (1983–1986) AR 4 (1959–1987) AZ 3 (1984–2026) MD 3 (1994–1998) WA 3 (1983–2014) NH 2 (1981–2022) MI 2 (1981–2020) MS 2 (2016–2019) VA 2 (2025–2025) NJ 2 (1996–2001) NM 2 (1960–1991)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check