Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1934–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Campbell-Ewald Co. v. Gomezgreen2 sentences2020Id. at 283 (citing Campbell-Ewald Co., 136 S. Ct. at 672 (“[A] would-be class representative with a live claim of her own must be accorded a fair opportunity to show that certification is warranted.”)). 2020Id. at 283 (citing Campbell-Ewald Co., 136 S. Ct. at 672 (“[A] would-be class representative with a live claim of her own must be accorded a fair opportunity to show that certification is warranted.”)). | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Richard Weiss, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Regal Collections Lancer Investments, Inc
green
2 sentences2020Second, a trial court must next consider whether the plaintiff submitted the issue of class certification to the trial court without “undue delay.” Id. at 287 (citing Weiss, 385 F.3d at 348 ). 2020Second, a trial court must next consider whether the plaintiff submitted the issue of class certification to the trial court without “undue delay.” Id. at 287 (citing Weiss, 385 F.3d at 348 ). | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Sebastian Richardson v. Director Federal Bureau of Pri
green
2 sentences2020Id. at 283 (citing Campbell-Ewald Co., 136 S. Ct. at 672 (“[A] would-be class representative with a live claim of her own must be accorded a fair opportunity to show that certification is warranted.”)). 2020Id. at 283 (citing Campbell-Ewald Co., 136 S. Ct. at 672 (“[A] would-be class representative with a live claim of her own must be accorded a fair opportunity to show that certification is warranted.”)). | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Batson v. City Laundry Co.
green
2 sentences1939S., 441, “finally determined in advance of the trial” upon the complaint, answer, and “stipulations filed by the parties.” To this end, the defendant sought to terminate the action by motion to dismiss, Batson v. Laundry, 206 N. C., 371 , 174 S. E., 90 , albeit the burden was on the plaintiff to show that he had brought a live claim to court. 1939S., 441, “finally determined in advance of the trial” upon the complaint, answer, and “stipulations filed by the parties.” To this end, the defendant sought to terminate the action by motion to dismiss, Batson v. Laundry, 206 N. C., 371 , 174 S. E., 90 , albeit the burden was on the plaintiff to show that he had brought a live claim to court. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Allen Ex Rel. Allen v. Kentucky-Virginia Stone Co.
green
1 sentence1939Allsbrook v. Walston, 212 N. C., 225 , 193 S. E., 151 . | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Allsbrook v. . Walston
green
1 sentence1939Allsbrook v. Walston, 212 N. C., 225 , 193 S. E., 151 . | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Savage v. . Currin
neutral
2 sentences1937“Upon the plea of the statute of limitations the burden is upon the plaintiff to show or to offer evidence tending to show that he has brought a live claim to court” — Brogden, J., in Savage v. Currin, 207 N. C., 222 , 176 S. E., 569 . *227 It is conceded that if the note in suit be a sealed instrument, the ten years statute, C. 1937“Upon the plea of the statute of limitations the burden is upon the plaintiff to show or to offer evidence tending to show that he has brought a live claim to court” — Brogden, J., in Savage v. Currin, 207 N. C., 222 , 176 S. E., 569 . *227 It is conceded that if the note in suit be a sealed instrument, the ten years statute, C. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Rankin v. . Oates
green
1 sentence1934Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 511 , 112 S. E., 32 ; Phillips v. Penland, 196 N. C., 425 , 147 S. E., 731 ; Drinkwater v. Telegraph Co., 204 N. C., 224 , 168 S. E., 410 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Drinkwater v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
neutral
2 sentences1934Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 511 , 112 S. E., 32 ; Phillips v. Penland, 196 N. C., 425 , 147 S. E., 731 ; Drinkwater v. Telegraph Co., 204 N. C., 224 , 168 S. E., 410 . 1934Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 511 , 112 S. E., 32 ; Phillips v. Penland, 196 N. C., 425 , 147 S. E., 731 ; Drinkwater v. Telegraph Co., 204 N. C., 224 , 168 S. E., 410 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
State v. . Dalton
neutral
1 sentence1934Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 511 , 112 S. E., 32 ; Phillips v. Penland, 196 N. C., 425 , 147 S. E., 731 ; Drinkwater v. Telegraph Co., 204 N. C., 224 , 168 S. E., 410 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Phillips v. . Penland
neutral
1 sentence1934Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 511 , 112 S. E., 32 ; Phillips v. Penland, 196 N. C., 425 , 147 S. E., 731 ; Drinkwater v. Telegraph Co., 204 N. C., 224 , 168 S. E., 410 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Woolen Mills v. . Land Co.
neutral
1 sentence1934Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 511 , 112 S. E., 32 ; Phillips v. Penland, 196 N. C., 425 , 147 S. E., 731 ; Drinkwater v. Telegraph Co., 204 N. C., 224 , 168 S. E., 410 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.