Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2012–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lawrencegreen2 sentences2025See State v. Lawrence, 365 N.C. 506, 516 , 723 S.E.2d 326, 333 (2012) (“Like federal plain error review, the North Carolina plain error standard of review applies only when the alleged error is unpreserved, and it requires the defendant to bear the heavier burden of showing that the error rises to the level of plain error.” (citation omitted)). 2025See State v. Lawrence, 365 N.C. 506, 516 , 723 S.E.2d 326, 333 (2012) (“Like federal plain error review, the North Carolina plain error standard of review applies only when the alleged error is unpreserved, and it requires the defendant to bear the heavier burden of showing that the error rises to the level of plain error.” (citation omitted)). | 3 | 5 |
State v. Melvingreen2 sentences2012See State v. Melvin, 364 N.C. 589, 593-94 , 707 S.E.2d 629, 632-33 (2010) (citation omitted). 2012See State v. Melvin, 364 N.C. 589, 593-94 , 707 S.E.2d 629, 632-33 (2010) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||