plaintiffs assign error (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

plaintiffs assign error in North Carolina

6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1948–2000 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Andrews v. . Jordangreen
nc · 1934 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1975–1975
1 sentence

1975See also Andrews v. Jordan, 205 N.C. 618 , 172 S.E. 819 (1934). [2, 3] The plaintiffs assign as error the adoption by the trial court of the referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to the damages caused by plaintiffs’ unlawful destruction of certain crops and timber on defendants’ land contending that the findings of “total market value” are vague and uncertain and do not support the award of damages.

11
National-Ben Franklin Fire Insurance v. Darbygreen
gactapp · 1933 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1975–1975
1 sentence

1975See also Andrews v. Jordan, 205 N.C. 618 , 172 S.E. 819 (1934). [2, 3] The plaintiffs assign as error the adoption by the trial court of the referee’s findings of fact and conclusions of law with respect to the damages caused by plaintiffs’ unlawful destruction of certain crops and timber on defendants’ land contending that the findings of “total market value” are vague and uncertain and do not support the award of damages.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Forbes v. Par Ten Group, Inc. green
ncctapp · 1990
1 sentence

2000First, plaintiffs rely on this Court’s holding in Forbes v. Par Ten Group, Inc., 99 N.C.

12000–2000
Penland v. . Wells green
nc · 1931
2 sentences

1986We believe we are bound by Penland v. Wells, 201 N.C. 173 , 159 S.E. 423 (1931) to sustain this assignment of error.

1986We believe we are bound by Penland v. Wells, 201 N.C. 173 , 159 S.E. 423 (1931) to sustain this assignment of error.

11986–1986
Kidd v. Early green
nc · 1976
2 sentences

1979Under Rule 56(c), summary judgment shall be entered “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 56(c); Kidd v. Early, 289 N.C. 343 , 222 S.E. 2d 392 (1976).

1979Under Rule 56(c), summary judgment shall be entered “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 56(c); Kidd v. Early, 289 N.C. 343 , 222 S.E. 2d 392 (1976).

11979–1979
Benton Ex Rel. Benton v. Montague green
nc · 1961
1 sentence

1968Benton v. Montague, 263 N.C. 695 , 117 S.E. 2d 771 . *101 In his charge to the jury the trial judge read the foregoing statutes, but he failed to instruct the jury that a violation of either, or both, of the statutes would constitute negligence; and the plaintiffs assign this as error.

11968–1968
Ellett v. . Ellett green
nc · 1911
1 sentence

1948Wilson v. Casualty Co., 210 N. C., 585 , 188 S. E., 102 ; Ellett v. Ellett, 157 N. C., 161 , 72 S. E., 861 , 39 L.

11948–1948
Wilson v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co. neutral
nc · 1936
2 sentences

1948Wilson v. Casualty Co., 210 N. C., 585 , 188 S. E., 102 ; Ellett v. Ellett, 157 N. C., 161 , 72 S. E., 861 , 39 L.

1948Wilson v. Casualty Co., 210 N. C., 585 , 188 S. E., 102 ; Ellett v. Ellett, 157 N. C., 161 , 72 S. E., 861 , 39 L.

11948–1948
Ellett v. Ellett neutral
nc · 1911
1 sentence

1948Wilson v. Casualty Co., 210 N. C., 585 , 188 S. E., 102 ; Ellett v. Ellett, 157 N. C., 161 , 72 S. E., 861 , 39 L.

11948–1948

Where else courts name it

CT 7 (1970–1983) NC 6 (1948–2000) NE 3 (1894–1984) LA 2 (2005–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check