warrant charging violation (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

warrant charging violation in North Carolina

6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1957–1974 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (15)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Harvey neutral
nc · 1955
2 sentences

1967State v. Harvey, 242 N.C. 111 , 86 S.E. 2d 793 ; State v. Eason, 242 N.C. 59 , 86 S.E. 2d 774 ; State v. Jenkins, 238 N.C. 396 , 77 S.E. 2d 796 .” In Fenner , and also in S. v. Taft, 256 N.C. 441 , 124 S.E. 2d 169 , referred to in Fenner , the warrants were held sufficient.

1967State v. Harvey, 242 N.C. 111 , 86 S.E. 2d 793 ; State v. Eason, 242 N.C. 59 , 86 S.E. 2d 774 ; State v. Jenkins, 238 N.C. 396 , 77 S.E. 2d 796 .” In Fenner , and also in S. v. Taft, 256 N.C. 441 , 124 S.E. 2d 169 , referred to in Fenner , the warrants were held sufficient.

21965–1967
State v. Eason green
nc · 1955
2 sentences

1967State v. Harvey, 242 N.C. 111 , 86 S.E. 2d 793 ; State v. Eason, 242 N.C. 59 , 86 S.E. 2d 774 ; State v. Jenkins, 238 N.C. 396 , 77 S.E. 2d 796 .” In Fenner , and also in S. v. Taft, 256 N.C. 441 , 124 S.E. 2d 169 , referred to in Fenner , the warrants were held sufficient.

1967State v. Harvey, 242 N.C. 111 , 86 S.E. 2d 793 ; State v. Eason, 242 N.C. 59 , 86 S.E. 2d 774 ; State v. Jenkins, 238 N.C. 396 , 77 S.E. 2d 796 .” In Fenner , and also in S. v. Taft, 256 N.C. 441 , 124 S.E. 2d 169 , referred to in Fenner , the warrants were held sufficient.

21965–1967
State v. Jenkins neutral
nc · 1953
2 sentences

1967State v. Harvey, 242 N.C. 111 , 86 S.E. 2d 793 ; State v. Eason, 242 N.C. 59 , 86 S.E. 2d 774 ; State v. Jenkins, 238 N.C. 396 , 77 S.E. 2d 796 .” In Fenner , and also in S. v. Taft, 256 N.C. 441 , 124 S.E. 2d 169 , referred to in Fenner , the warrants were held sufficient.

1967State v. Harvey, 242 N.C. 111 , 86 S.E. 2d 793 ; State v. Eason, 242 N.C. 59 , 86 S.E. 2d 774 ; State v. Jenkins, 238 N.C. 396 , 77 S.E. 2d 796 .” In Fenner , and also in S. v. Taft, 256 N.C. 441 , 124 S.E. 2d 169 , referred to in Fenner , the warrants were held sufficient.

21965–1967
State v. Underwood green
nc · 1973
2 sentences

1974State v. Underwood, 283 N.C. 154 , 195 S.E. 2d 489 .

1974State v. Underwood, 283 N.C. 154 , 195 S.E. 2d 489 .

11974–1974
State v. . Langston neutral
nc · 1883
1 sentence

1972In State v. Langston, supra, the defendant was convicted in the mayor’s court of the City of Goldsboro upon a warrant charging violation of a city ordinance which forbade any person, having a license, to sell spirituous liquors on the Sabbath and imposed a fine of $20.00 for such offense.

11972–1972
State v. Morris green
nc · 1969
2 sentences

1969State v. Morris, 275 N.C. 50 , 165 S.E. 2d 245 .

1969State v. Morris, 275 N.C. 50 , 165 S.E. 2d 245 .

11969–1969
State v. Fenner green
nc · 1965
2 sentences

1967In S. v. Fenner, 263 N.C. 694, 700 , 140 S.E. 2d 349, 353 , Moore, J., for the Court, summarizes the holdings in prior decisions as follows: “A warrant charging a violation of G.S. 14-223 must, in addition to formal parts, the name of accused, the date of the offense and the county or locality in which it was alleged to have been committed, (a) identify by name the person alleged to have been resisted, delayed or obstructed, and-describe his official character with sufficient certainty to show that he was a public officer within the purview of the statute, (b) indicate the official duty he was

1967In S. v. Fenner, 263 N.C. 694, 700 , 140 S.E. 2d 349, 353 , Moore, J., for the Court, summarizes the holdings in prior decisions as follows: “A warrant charging a violation of G.S. 14-223 must, in addition to formal parts, the name of accused, the date of the offense and the county or locality in which it was alleged to have been committed, (a) identify by name the person alleged to have been resisted, delayed or obstructed, and-describe his official character with sufficient certainty to show that he was a public officer within the purview of the statute, (b) indicate the official duty he was

11967–1967
State v. Taft green
nc · 1962
2 sentences

1967State v. Harvey, 242 N.C. 111 , 86 S.E. 2d 793 ; State v. Eason, 242 N.C. 59 , 86 S.E. 2d 774 ; State v. Jenkins, 238 N.C. 396 , 77 S.E. 2d 796 .” In Fenner , and also in S. v. Taft, 256 N.C. 441 , 124 S.E. 2d 169 , referred to in Fenner , the warrants were held sufficient.

1967State v. Harvey, 242 N.C. 111 , 86 S.E. 2d 793 ; State v. Eason, 242 N.C. 59 , 86 S.E. 2d 774 ; State v. Jenkins, 238 N.C. 396 , 77 S.E. 2d 796 .” In Fenner , and also in S. v. Taft, 256 N.C. 441 , 124 S.E. 2d 169 , referred to in Fenner , the warrants were held sufficient.

11967–1967
State v. . Taylor neutral
nc · 1896
2 sentences

1957State v. Cooke, 246 N.C. 518 , 98 S.E. 2d 885 ; S. v. Mills, 246 N.C. 237 , 98 S.E. 2d 329 ; S. v. McHone, 243 N.C. 231 , 90 S.E. 2d 536 ; S. v. Clegg, 214 N.C. 675 , 200 S.E. 371 ; S. v. Goff, 205 N.C. 545 , 172 S.E. 407 ; S. v. Taylor, 118 N.C. 1262 , 24 S.E. 526 .

1957State v. Cooke, 246 N.C. 518 , 98 S.E. 2d 885 ; S. v. Mills, 246 N.C. 237 , 98 S.E. 2d 329 ; S. v. McHone, 243 N.C. 231 , 90 S.E. 2d 536 ; S. v. Clegg, 214 N.C. 675 , 200 S.E. 371 ; S. v. Goff, 205 N.C. 545 , 172 S.E. 407 ; S. v. Taylor, 118 N.C. 1262 , 24 S.E. 526 .

11957–1957
State v. . Goff green
nc · 1934
2 sentences

1957State v. Cooke, 246 N.C. 518 , 98 S.E. 2d 885 ; S. v. Mills, 246 N.C. 237 , 98 S.E. 2d 329 ; S. v. McHone, 243 N.C. 231 , 90 S.E. 2d 536 ; S. v. Clegg, 214 N.C. 675 , 200 S.E. 371 ; S. v. Goff, 205 N.C. 545 , 172 S.E. 407 ; S. v. Taylor, 118 N.C. 1262 , 24 S.E. 526 .

1957State v. Cooke, 246 N.C. 518 , 98 S.E. 2d 885 ; S. v. Mills, 246 N.C. 237 , 98 S.E. 2d 329 ; S. v. McHone, 243 N.C. 231 , 90 S.E. 2d 536 ; S. v. Clegg, 214 N.C. 675 , 200 S.E. 371 ; S. v. Goff, 205 N.C. 545 , 172 S.E. 407 ; S. v. Taylor, 118 N.C. 1262 , 24 S.E. 526 .

11957–1957
State v. . Bell green
nc · 1933
2 sentences

1957This Court said in S. v. Bell, 205 N.C. 225 , 171 S.E. 50 : ". jeopardy attaches when a defendant in a criminal prosecution is placed on trial: (1) On a valid indictment or information, (2) before a court of competent jurisdiction, (3) after arraignment, (4) after plea, and (5) when a competent jury has been empaneled and sworn to make true deliverance in the case.” Jeopardy did not attach at the July Term 1956 on the amended change in the warrant charging a violation of G.S. 18-48, because the court had no jurisdiction to try him for such offense.

1957This Court said in S. v. Bell, 205 N.C. 225 , 171 S.E. 50 : ". jeopardy attaches when a defendant in a criminal prosecution is placed on trial: (1) On a valid indictment or information, (2) before a court of competent jurisdiction, (3) after arraignment, (4) after plea, and (5) when a competent jury has been empaneled and sworn to make true deliverance in the case.” Jeopardy did not attach at the July Term 1956 on the amended change in the warrant charging a violation of G.S. 18-48, because the court had no jurisdiction to try him for such offense.

11957–1957
Tate v. . Clegg neutral
nc · 1939
2 sentences

1957State v. Cooke, 246 N.C. 518 , 98 S.E. 2d 885 ; S. v. Mills, 246 N.C. 237 , 98 S.E. 2d 329 ; S. v. McHone, 243 N.C. 231 , 90 S.E. 2d 536 ; S. v. Clegg, 214 N.C. 675 , 200 S.E. 371 ; S. v. Goff, 205 N.C. 545 , 172 S.E. 407 ; S. v. Taylor, 118 N.C. 1262 , 24 S.E. 526 .

1957State v. Cooke, 246 N.C. 518 , 98 S.E. 2d 885 ; S. v. Mills, 246 N.C. 237 , 98 S.E. 2d 329 ; S. v. McHone, 243 N.C. 231 , 90 S.E. 2d 536 ; S. v. Clegg, 214 N.C. 675 , 200 S.E. 371 ; S. v. Goff, 205 N.C. 545 , 172 S.E. 407 ; S. v. Taylor, 118 N.C. 1262 , 24 S.E. 526 .

11957–1957
State v. McHone green
nc · 1955
2 sentences

1957State v. Cooke, 246 N.C. 518 , 98 S.E. 2d 885 ; S. v. Mills, 246 N.C. 237 , 98 S.E. 2d 329 ; S. v. McHone, 243 N.C. 231 , 90 S.E. 2d 536 ; S. v. Clegg, 214 N.C. 675 , 200 S.E. 371 ; S. v. Goff, 205 N.C. 545 , 172 S.E. 407 ; S. v. Taylor, 118 N.C. 1262 , 24 S.E. 526 .

1957State v. Cooke, 246 N.C. 518 , 98 S.E. 2d 885 ; S. v. Mills, 246 N.C. 237 , 98 S.E. 2d 329 ; S. v. McHone, 243 N.C. 231 , 90 S.E. 2d 536 ; S. v. Clegg, 214 N.C. 675 , 200 S.E. 371 ; S. v. Goff, 205 N.C. 545 , 172 S.E. 407 ; S. v. Taylor, 118 N.C. 1262 , 24 S.E. 526 .

11957–1957
State v. Mills green
nc · 1957
2 sentences

1957State v. Cooke, 246 N.C. 518 , 98 S.E. 2d 885 ; S. v. Mills, 246 N.C. 237 , 98 S.E. 2d 329 ; S. v. McHone, 243 N.C. 231 , 90 S.E. 2d 536 ; S. v. Clegg, 214 N.C. 675 , 200 S.E. 371 ; S. v. Goff, 205 N.C. 545 , 172 S.E. 407 ; S. v. Taylor, 118 N.C. 1262 , 24 S.E. 526 .

1957State v. Cooke, 246 N.C. 518 , 98 S.E. 2d 885 ; S. v. Mills, 246 N.C. 237 , 98 S.E. 2d 329 ; S. v. McHone, 243 N.C. 231 , 90 S.E. 2d 536 ; S. v. Clegg, 214 N.C. 675 , 200 S.E. 371 ; S. v. Goff, 205 N.C. 545 , 172 S.E. 407 ; S. v. Taylor, 118 N.C. 1262 , 24 S.E. 526 .

11957–1957
State v. Cooke green
nc · 1957
2 sentences

1957State v. Cooke, 246 N.C. 518 , 98 S.E. 2d 885 ; S. v. Mills, 246 N.C. 237 , 98 S.E. 2d 329 ; S. v. McHone, 243 N.C. 231 , 90 S.E. 2d 536 ; S. v. Clegg, 214 N.C. 675 , 200 S.E. 371 ; S. v. Goff, 205 N.C. 545 , 172 S.E. 407 ; S. v. Taylor, 118 N.C. 1262 , 24 S.E. 526 .

1957State v. Cooke, 246 N.C. 518 , 98 S.E. 2d 885 ; S. v. Mills, 246 N.C. 237 , 98 S.E. 2d 329 ; S. v. McHone, 243 N.C. 231 , 90 S.E. 2d 536 ; S. v. Clegg, 214 N.C. 675 , 200 S.E. 371 ; S. v. Goff, 205 N.C. 545 , 172 S.E. 407 ; S. v. Taylor, 118 N.C. 1262 , 24 S.E. 526 .

11957–1957

Where else courts name it

NC 6 (1957–1974) TN 2 (1953–1975) VA 2 (1991–1994) SC 2 (2000–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check