Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 2012–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusettsgreen2 sentences2012The Court reiterated the meaning of the “core class of testimonial statements” from Crmvford, 541 U.S. at 51-52 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , and explained the certificates of analysis were within that core class because they were “solemn declaration^] or affirmation[s] made for the purpose of establishing or proving ... that the substance ... was, as the prosecution claimed, cocaine — the precise testimony the analyst would be expected to provide if called at trial.” Melendez-Diaz, 557 U.S. at 310 , 129 S.Ct. 2527 (quoting Crawford, 541 U.S. at 51 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 ). 2012The Court reiterated the meaning of the “core class of testimonial statements” from Crmvford, 541 U.S. at 51-52 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , and explained the certificates of analysis were within that core class because they were “solemn declaration^] or affirmation[s] made for the purpose of establishing or proving ... that the substance ... was, as the prosecution claimed, cocaine — the precise testimony the analyst would be expected to provide if called at trial.” Melendez-Diaz, 557 U.S. at 310 , 129 S.Ct. 2527 (quoting Crawford, 541 U.S. at 51 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 ). | 2 | 6 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Crawford v. Washington
green
2 sentences2012The Court reiterated the meaning of the “core class of testimonial statements” from Crmvford, 541 U.S. at 51-52 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , and explained the certificates of analysis were within that core class because they were “solemn declaration^] or affirmation[s] made for the purpose of establishing or proving ... that the substance ... was, as the prosecution claimed, cocaine — the precise testimony the analyst would be expected to provide if called at trial.” Melendez-Diaz, 557 U.S. at 310 , 129 S.Ct. 2527 (quoting Crawford, 541 U.S. at 51 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 ). 2012The Court reiterated the meaning of the “core class of testimonial statements” from Crmvford, 541 U.S. at 51-52 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , and explained the certificates of analysis were within that core class because they were “solemn declaration^] or affirmation[s] made for the purpose of establishing or proving ... that the substance ... was, as the prosecution claimed, cocaine — the precise testimony the analyst would be expected to provide if called at trial.” Melendez-Diaz, 557 U.S. at 310 , 129 S.Ct. 2527 (quoting Crawford, 541 U.S. at 51 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 ). | 2 | 2012–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.