Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Fargo v. Ruethergreen1 sentence2010Although statutorily-enacted rules of procedure which supplement the rules we have promulgated may remain in effect until superseded or amended by this [C]ourt ..., Article VI, Section 3, mandates that a court-promulgated procedural rule prevails in a conflict with a legislatively-enacted rule of procedure.’ ” Ruether , at 483 (quoting City of Fargo v. Dawson, 466 N.W.2d 584 , 586 n. 1 (N.D.1991)) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Gegelman Ex Rel. Gegelman v. Reiersgaardgreen1 sentence1991Although statutorily-enacted rules of procedure which supplement the rules we have promulgated may remain in effect until superseded or amended by this court [State v. Vetsch, 368 N.W.2d 547, 552 (N.D.1985); Geg elman v. Reiersgaard, 273 N.W.2d 703, 706 (N.D.1979) ], Article VI, Section 3, mandates that a court-promulgated procedural rule prevails in a conflict with a legislatively-enacted rule of procedure. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Vetschgreen1 sentence1991Although statutorily-enacted rules of procedure which supplement the rules we have promulgated may remain in effect until superseded or amended by this court [State v. Vetsch, 368 N.W.2d 547, 552 (N.D.1985); Geg elman v. Reiersgaard, 273 N.W.2d 703, 706 (N.D.1979) ], Article VI, Section 3, mandates that a court-promulgated procedural rule prevails in a conflict with a legislatively-enacted rule of procedure. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Fargo v. Dawson
green
2 sentences2018Although statutorily-enacted rules of procedure which supplement the rules we have promulgated may remain in effect until superseded or amended by this [C]ourt[.] Article VI, Section 3, mandates that a court-promulgated procedural rule prevails in a conflict with a legislatively-enacted rule of procedure.' " Ruether , at 483 , (quoting City of Fargo v. Dawson , 466 N.W.2d 584 , 586 n. 1 (N.D. 1991) ) (citations omitted). 2010Although statutorily-enacted rules of procedure which supplement the rules we have promulgated may remain in effect until superseded or amended by this [C]ourt ..., Article VI, Section 3, mandates that a court-promulgated procedural rule prevails in a conflict with a legislatively-enacted rule of procedure.’ ” Ruether , at 483 (quoting City of Fargo v. Dawson, 466 N.W.2d 584 , 586 n. 1 (N.D.1991)) (citations omitted). | 4 | 1992–2018 |
State v. Ebertz
green
1 sentence2022“Although statutorily-enacted rules of procedure which supplement the rules we have promulgated may remain in effect until superseded or amended by this Court, Article VI, Section 3, mandates that a court-promulgated procedural rule prevails in a conflict with a legislatively-enacted rule of procedure.” Id. (cleaned up). [¶17] Section 14-09-06.6(4), N.D.C.C., establishes the procedure for a party seeking modification of primary residential responsibility, which provides as follows: A party seeking modification of an order concerning primary residential responsibility shall serve and file movin | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Farmers Union Oil Co. v. Harp
green
1 sentence1992Farmers Union Oil Co. v. Harp, 462 N.W.2d 152 (N.D.1990); First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Scherr, 456 N.W.2d 531 (N.D.1990); Thomas v. Thomas, 382 N.W.2d 639 (N.D.1986). [3] Because § 32-11-02, N.D.C.C., and Rule 22(a), N.D.R.Civ.P., both require multiple adverse claimants, this is not a case in which "a court-promulgated procedural rule prevails in a conflict with a legislatively-enacted rule of procedure." City of Fargo v. Dawson, 466 N.W.2d 584 , 586 n. 4 (N.D.1991). [1] Jack Green challenges the trial court's finding that Heigaard authorized improvements. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
First National Bank & Trust Co. of Williston v. Scherr
green
1 sentence1992Farmers Union Oil Co. v. Harp, 462 N.W.2d 152 (N.D.1990); First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Scherr, 456 N.W.2d 531 (N.D.1990); Thomas v. Thomas, 382 N.W.2d 639 (N.D.1986). [3] Because § 32-11-02, N.D.C.C., and Rule 22(a), N.D.R.Civ.P., both require multiple adverse claimants, this is not a case in which "a court-promulgated procedural rule prevails in a conflict with a legislatively-enacted rule of procedure." City of Fargo v. Dawson, 466 N.W.2d 584 , 586 n. 4 (N.D.1991). [1] Jack Green challenges the trial court's finding that Heigaard authorized improvements. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Thomas v. Thomas
green
1 sentence1992Farmers Union Oil Co. v. Harp, 462 N.W.2d 152 (N.D.1990); First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Scherr, 456 N.W.2d 531 (N.D.1990); Thomas v. Thomas, 382 N.W.2d 639 (N.D.1986). [3] Because § 32-11-02, N.D.C.C., and Rule 22(a), N.D.R.Civ.P., both require multiple adverse claimants, this is not a case in which "a court-promulgated procedural rule prevails in a conflict with a legislatively-enacted rule of procedure." City of Fargo v. Dawson, 466 N.W.2d 584 , 586 n. 4 (N.D.1991). [1] Jack Green challenges the trial court's finding that Heigaard authorized improvements. | 1 | 1992–1992 |