Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Edwards v. Edwardsgreen1 sentence2013See, also, Edwards v. Edwards, 16 Neb. | 1 | 1 |
Bedrosky v. Hinergreen2 sentences2013Cos., 267 Neb. 569 , 675 N.W.2d 665 (2004) (whatever the construction of a particular clause of a contract, standing alone, may be, it must be read in connection with other clauses); Bedrosky v. Hiner, 230 Neb. 200, 204 , 430 N.W.2d 535, 539 (1988) (“party may not pick and choose among the clauses of the contract, accepting only those that advantage it”). 2013Cos., 267 Neb. 569 , 675 N.W.2d 665 (2004) (whatever the construction of a particular clause of a contract, standing alone, may be, it must be read in connection with other clauses); Bedrosky v. Hiner, 230 Neb. 200, 204 , 430 N.W.2d 535, 539 (1988) (“party may not pick and choose among the clauses of the contract, accepting only those that advantage it”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hearst-Argyle v. Entrex Communication Svcs.
green
2 sentences2022Id. 2014Hearst-Argyle Prop. v. Entrex Comm. Servs., 279 Neb. 468 , 778 N.W.2d 465 (2010). | 2 | 2014–2022 |
Labenz v. Labenz
neutral
2 sentences2020Id. 2019Id. | 2 | 2019–2020 |
Poulton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Companies
green
2 sentences2013Cos., 267 Neb. 569 , 675 N.W.2d 665 (2004) (whatever the construction of a particular clause of a contract, standing alone, may be, it must be read in connection with other clauses); Bedrosky v. Hiner, 230 Neb. 200, 204 , 430 N.W.2d 535, 539 (1988) (“party may not pick and choose among the clauses of the contract, accepting only those that advantage it”). 2013Cos., 267 Neb. 569 , 675 N.W.2d 665 (2004) (whatever the construction of a particular clause of a contract, standing alone, may be, it must be read in connection with other clauses); Bedrosky v. Hiner, 230 Neb. 200, 204 , 430 N.W.2d 535, 539 (1988) (“party may not pick and choose among the clauses of the contract, accepting only those that advantage it”). | 2 | 2005–2013 |
Davenport Ltd. v. 75th & Dodge I
green
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.