Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 1974–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gouldgreen2 sentences2014“Although a high degree of necessity is required before a mistrial is declared, ‘manifest necessity’is a variable standard which cannot be applied mechanically.” State v. Gould, 144 N.H. 415, 417 (1999). 2001Although a high degree of necessity is needed to declare a mistrial, “manifest necessity is a variable standard that cannot be applied mechanically.” State v. Gould, 144 N.H. 415, 417 (1999) (quotation omitted). | 2 | 4 |
State v. Solomongreen1 sentence2014“Determining whether manifest necessity exists to justify the declaration of a mistrial requires a balancing of competing concerns: the defendant’s interests in completing his trial in a single proceeding before a particular tribunal versus the strength of the justification for a mistrial.” State v. Solomon, 157 N.H. 47, 52 (2008) (quotation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Illinois v. Somervillegreen1 sentence2009See Somerville, 410 U.S. at 464, 467 ; Gould, 144 N.H. at 417 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bertrandgreen2 sentences1999See id. at 853 , 587 A.2d at 1225 . 1999See id. at 853 , 587 A.2d at 1225 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Public Service Co. v. New Hampton
green
1 sentence1974This court held in Public Service Co. v. New Hampton, 101 N.E. 142 , 136 A.2d 591 (1957), that the market value of a public utility for property tax purposes is not limited to the value placed on it for rate-making purposes. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.