Port Authority analysis in New Jersey

6 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services v. GFgreen nj · 2009 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 1 sentence 2010See LaPlace v. Briere, 404 N.J.Super. 585, 588-89 , 962 A. 2d 1139 (App.Div.2009) (holding that a bailee "must have possession and primary control over the chattel" for a bailment to arise) (citing City of Jersey City v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., 14 N.J. 112, 115 , 101 A. 2d 555 (1953)), certif. denied, 199 N.J. 133 , 970 A. 2d 1049 (2009)).	1	1
City of Jersey City v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.green nj · 1953 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See LaPlace v. Briere, 404 N.J.Super. 585, 588-89 , 962 A. 2d 1139 (App.Div.2009) (holding that a bailee "must have possession and primary control over the chattel" for a bailment to arise) (citing City of Jersey City v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., 14 N.J. 112, 115 , 101 A. 2d 555 (1953)), certif. denied, 199 N.J. 133 , 970 A. 2d 1049 (2009)). 2010See LaPlace v. Briere, 404 N.J.Super. 585, 588-89 , 962 A. 2d 1139 (App.Div.2009) (holding that a bailee "must have possession and primary control over the chattel" for a bailment to arise) (citing City of Jersey City v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., 14 N.J. 112, 115 , 101 A. 2d 555 (1953)), certif. denied, 199 N.J. 133 , 970 A. 2d 1049 (2009)).	1	1
LaPlace v. Brieregreen njsuperctappdiv · 2009 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See LaPlace v. Briere, 404 N.J.Super. 585, 588-89 , 962 A. 2d 1139 (App.Div.2009) (holding that a bailee "must have possession and primary control over the chattel" for a bailment to arise) (citing City of Jersey City v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., 14 N.J. 112, 115 , 101 A. 2d 555 (1953)), certif. denied, 199 N.J. 133 , 970 A. 2d 1049 (2009)). 2010See LaPlace v. Briere, 404 N.J.Super. 585, 588-89 , 962 A. 2d 1139 (App.Div.2009) (holding that a bailee "must have possession and primary control over the chattel" for a bailment to arise) (citing City of Jersey City v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co., 14 N.J. 112, 115 , 101 A. 2d 555 (1953)), certif. denied, 199 N.J. 133 , 970 A. 2d 1049 (2009)).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

Case	Cited	Years
Rose v. Port of New York Authority green nj · 1972 2 sentences 2005Id. at 136 , 293 A.2d 371 . 2005Id. at 136 , 293 A.2d 371 .	2	2005–2005
Bell v. Bell green nj · 1980 2 sentences 2013In Bell v. Bell, 83 N.J. 417, 423-24 , 416 A.2d 829 (1980), the Court considered the application of the notice provisions of the Tort Claims Act to another bi-state agency, the Delaware River Port Authority (DRPA). 2013In Bell v. Bell, 83 N.J. 417, 423-24 , 416 A.2d 829 (1980), the Court considered the application of the notice provisions of the Tort Claims Act to another bi-state agency, the Delaware River Port Authority (DRPA).	1	2013–2013
Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corporation green scotus · 1994 2 sentences 1995Following that decision, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson, 513 U.S. --, 115 S.Ct. 394 , 130 L.Ed.2d 245 (1994), in which its denial of Port Authority’s claim of Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit in the federal court required reexamination of the corporate structure of Port Authority and its relationship to New York and New Jersey. 1995Following that decision, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson, 513 U.S. --, 115 S.Ct. 394 , 130 L.Ed.2d 245 (1994), in which its denial of Port Authority’s claim of Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit in the federal court required reexamination of the corporate structure of Port Authority and its relationship to New York and New Jersey.	1	1995–1995
Lieberman v. Port Authority green njsuperctappdiv · 1992 2 sentences 1993The Appellate Division reversed and held that the activities for which plaintiff sought to hold the Port Authority liable stemmed directly from its failure to allocate police resources. 254 N.J.Super. 456 , 603 A.2d 983 (1992). 1993The Appellate Division reversed and held that the activities for which plaintiff sought to hold the Port Authority liable stemmed directly from its failure to allocate police resources. 254 N.J.Super. 456 , 603 A.2d 983 (1992).	1	1993–1993

Where else courts name it

NY 27 (1958–2025) NJ 6 (1993–2013) TX 2 (1993–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check