Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Nevada opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Donna Young v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2018See Young v. United States, 769 F.3d 1047, 1053-54 (9th Cir. 2014) (providing that a district court must first identify the specific agency action challenged before turning to the Berkovitz-Gaubert test); cf. N. Nev. 2018See Young v. United States , 769 F.3d 1047 , 1053-54 (9th Cir. 2014) (providing that a district court must first identify the specific agency action challenged before turning to the Berkovitz - Gaubert test); cf. N. Nev. | 5 | 5 |
Northern Nevada Ass'n of Injured Workers v. Nevada State Industrial Insurance Systemgreen2 sentences2018Sys., 107 Nev. 108, 114 , 807 P.2d 728, 731 (1991) (explaining that mandatory duties entail little or no discretion, and that the discretionary- act immunity doctrine does not apply to such obligatory acts). 2018Sys., 107 Nev. 108, 114 , 807 P.2d 728, 731 (1991) (explaining that mandatory duties entail little or no discretion, and that the discretionary- act immunity doctrine does not apply to such obligatory acts). | 4 | 5 |
Johnson v. Browngreen2 sentences2018While Johnson was decided before NRS 41.032, the discretionary-act immunity statute, was enacted, 75 Nev. at 437 , 345 P.2d at 754 ; 1965 Nev. 2018While Johnson was decided before NRS 41.032, the discretionary-act immunity statute, was enacted, 75 Nev. at 437 , 345 P.2d at 754 ; 1965 Nev. | 1 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Martinez v. Maruszczak
green
2 sentences2018Under the Berkovitz-Gaubert test, the discretionary-act immunity doctrine applies if the decision "(1) involve[s] an element of individual judgment or choice and (2) [is] based on considerations of social, economic, or political policy." Id. at 446-47 , 168 P.3d at 729. 2018Under the Berkovitz - Gaubert test, the discretionary-act immunity doctrine applies if the decision "(1) involve[s] an element of individual judgment or choice and (2) [is] based on considerations of social, economic, or political policy." Id. at 446-47 , 168 P.3d at 729. | 6 | 2007–2018 |
cluster 438806
green
1 sentence2018This conclusion is consistent with the approach taken by several other jurisdictions. 9 See Biscoe v. Arlington Cty., 738 F.2d 1352 , 1363 (D.C. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.