Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New York opinions name it 4 courts 1857–1958 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sirey v. Braems
neutral
2 sentences1903As said in Peck v. Hiler ( 24 Barb. 178): “ An interruption of the enjoyment of a privilege conferred by a lease by physical means adopted by the landlord constitutes an eviction and suspends the rent of the * * * premises, and the remedy of the lessor for the recovery of the possession.” And in Sirey v. Braems ( 65 App. Div. 472 ) it was held (head note) that “ the eviction of a tenant from a portion of the demised premises suspends, during the continuance of the eviction, the right of the landlord to maintain summary proceedings against the tenant for non-payment of rent.” We have not overlo 1903As said in Peck v. Hiler, 24 Barb. 178 : “An interruption of the enjoyment of the privilege conferred by a lease by physical means adopted by the landlord constitutes an eviction, and suspends the rent of the * * * premises, and the remedy of the lessor for the recovery of the possession.” And in Sirey v. Braems, 65 App. Div. 472 , 72 N. Y. | 2 | 1903–1903 |
Peck v. Hiler
green
2 sentences1903As said in Peck v. Hiler ( 24 Barb. 178): “ An interruption of the enjoyment of a privilege conferred by a lease by physical means adopted by the landlord constitutes an eviction and suspends the rent of the * * * premises, and the remedy of the lessor for the recovery of the possession.” And in Sirey v. Braems ( 65 App. Div. 472 ) it was held (head note) that “ the eviction of a tenant from a portion of the demised premises suspends, during the continuance of the eviction, the right of the landlord to maintain summary proceedings against the tenant for non-payment of rent.” We have not overlo 1903As said in Peck v. Hiler, 24 Barb. 178 : “An interruption of the enjoyment of the privilege conferred by a lease by physical means adopted by the landlord constitutes an eviction, and suspends the rent of the * * * premises, and the remedy of the lessor for the recovery of the possession.” And in Sirey v. Braems, 65 App. Div. 472 , 72 N. Y. | 2 | 1903–1903 |
Christie v. 46th St. Theatre Corp.
neutral
1 sentence1958Theatre Corp., 265 App. Div. 255 , affd. 292 N. Y. 520 , cert. denied 323 U. S. 710 ). | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Christie v. 46th St. Theatre Corp.
neutral
1 sentence1958Theatre Corp., 265 App. Div. 255 , affd. 292 N. Y. 520 , cert. denied 323 U. S. 710 ). | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Sitamore v. Mayo
neutral
1 sentence1958Theatre Corp., 265 App. Div. 255 , affd. 292 N. Y. 520 , cert. denied 323 U. S. 710 ). | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Sirey v. Braems
neutral
1 sentence1903As said in Peck v. Hiler, 24 Barb. 178 : “An interruption of the enjoyment of the privilege conferred by a lease by physical means adopted by the landlord constitutes an eviction, and suspends the rent of the * * * premises, and the remedy of the lessor for the recovery of the possession.” And in Sirey v. Braems, 65 App. Div. 472 , 72 N. Y. | 1 | 1903–1903 |
People v. . Platt
green
1 sentence1895People v. Platt, 117 N. Y. 167 ; 27 St. | 1 | 1895–1895 |
De Meli v. . De Meli
green
1 sentence1893Rep.:) “The relation is one which has a legal sanction, and in some cases secures its possessor a settlement and pauper privileges under the poor laws; and, in all cases where a statute provides residence as a qualification for the enjoyment of a privilege or the exercise of a franchise, the word is equivalent to the place of domicile of the person who claims its benefit. ” (The italics are mine.) The question came again before the court of appeals in De Meli v. De Meli, (April term, 1890,) 120 N. Y. 485 , 24 N. E. | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Lewis v. Payn
green
1 sentence1857But it was remarked by the chief justice, that “ had the landlord, afteT the raceway was dug and the water let in, and enjoyment by the tenant, subsequently diverted the water from the raceway, or a part of it, that, I think, would have amounted to an eviction within the cases of Lewis v. Payn, ( 4 Wend. 423 ,) and Dyett v. Pendleton, (8 Cowen, 727 ;) which last case, in the court of errors, carried the doctrine of eviction to the utmost verge.” I have no difficulty in concurring in the opinion that an interruption to the enjoyment of a privilege conferred by a lease, by physical means adopted | 1 | 1857–1857 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.