Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New York opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Fagangreen2 sentences2015Thus, “[w]e conclude that, under the circumstances, defense counsel’s affirmation was sufficient to raise a factual issue necessitating a hearing” (People v Fagan, 203 AD2d 933, 933 [1994]). 2015Thus, “[w]e conclude that, under the circumstances, defense counsel’s affirmation was sufficient to raise a factual issue necessitating a hearing” (People v Fagan, 203 AD2d 933, 933 [1994]). | 2 | 3 |
People v. Jonesgreen1 sentence2021We conclude that, under these circumstances, defendant sufficiently raised a factual issue necessitating a hearing ( see generally People v Jones , 132 AD3d 1388, 1388-1389 [4th Dept 2015]). | 1 | 1 |
Roberts v. Ankagreen1 sentence2011The appellants neither refuted the prima facie evidence of proper service nor raised a factual issue necessitating a hearing to determine the validity of service of process (see Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v McGloster, 48 AD3d at 457 ; Roberts v Anka, 45 AD3d 752, 753-754 [2007]; Simmons First Natl. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP v. Albert
green
1 sentence2018By failing to proffer her own sworn statement as to her actual dwelling place or swear to specific facts rebutting the statements in the process server's affidavit, Perez failed to refute the prima facie evidence of proper service and raise a factual issue necessitating a hearing to determine the validity of service of process ( see NYCTL 2009-A Trust v Tsafatinos , 101 [*2]AD3d 1092; Matter of Goldberger v Gansburg , 85 AD3d at 915 ; Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP v Albert , 78 AD3d 983, 984 ; Chemical Bank v Darnley , 300 AD2d 613, 613-614 ). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In re Epstein
neutral
1 sentence2018By failing to proffer her own sworn statement as to her actual dwelling place or swear to specific facts rebutting the statements in the process server's affidavit, Perez failed to refute the prima facie evidence of proper service and raise a factual issue necessitating a hearing to determine the validity of service of process ( see NYCTL 2009-A Trust v Tsafatinos , 101 [*2]AD3d 1092; Matter of Goldberger v Gansburg , 85 AD3d at 915 ; Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP v Albert , 78 AD3d 983, 984 ; Chemical Bank v Darnley , 300 AD2d 613, 613-614 ). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Chemical Bank v. Darnley
green
1 sentence2018By failing to proffer her own sworn statement as to her actual dwelling place or swear to specific facts rebutting the statements in the process server's affidavit, Perez failed to refute the prima facie evidence of proper service and raise a factual issue necessitating a hearing to determine the validity of service of process ( see NYCTL 2009-A Trust v Tsafatinos , 101 [*2]AD3d 1092; Matter of Goldberger v Gansburg , 85 AD3d at 915 ; Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, LP v Albert , 78 AD3d 983, 984 ; Chemical Bank v Darnley , 300 AD2d 613, 613-614 ). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Dennis McGloster
green
1 sentence2011The appellants neither refuted the prima facie evidence of proper service nor raised a factual issue necessitating a hearing to determine the validity of service of process (see Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v McGloster, 48 AD3d at 457 ; Roberts v Anka, 45 AD3d 752, 753-754 [2007]; Simmons First Natl. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Simmons First National Bank v. Mandracchia
green
1 sentence2011Bank v Mandracchia, 248 AD2d at 375 ). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.