Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New York opinions name it 3 courts 1921–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Doe v. Axelrodgreen1 sentence2009A preliminary injunction may issue if the movant demonstrates, by clear and convincing evidence, (1) a likelihood of ultimate success on the merits; (2) irreparable injury absent the granting of the preliminary injunction; and (3) that a balancing of the equities favors the moving party (see Doe v Axelrod, 73 NY2d 748, 750 [1988]; Gluck v Hoary, 55 AD3d 668 [2008]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gluck v. Chevre Liady Nusach Hoary
green
1 sentence2009A preliminary injunction may issue if the movant demonstrates, by clear and convincing evidence, (1) a likelihood of ultimate success on the merits; (2) irreparable injury absent the granting of the preliminary injunction; and (3) that a balancing of the equities favors the moving party (see Doe v Axelrod, 73 NY2d 748, 750 [1988]; Gluck v Hoary, 55 AD3d 668 [2008]). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Silver v. Pataki
green
1 sentence2003Litigation ensued over the Governor’s challenge to the Speaker’s standing and capacity to sue, which resulted in a July 2001 Court of Appeals ruling in the Speaker’s favor (see Silver v Pataki, 96 NY2d 532 [2001]). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
In re Kaufman
neutral
1 sentence2000However, capacity must be found based on an express legal grant of capacity or on a necessary implication from a grant of other legal powers (Tinterorias Ibericas De Peleteria v Gafco, Inc., 114 AD2d 329 ; Regan v Cuomo, 182 AD2d 1060, 1061 ). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Regan v. Cuomo
neutral
1 sentence2000However, capacity must be found based on an express legal grant of capacity or on a necessary implication from a grant of other legal powers (Tinterorias Ibericas De Peleteria v Gafco, Inc., 114 AD2d 329 ; Regan v Cuomo, 182 AD2d 1060, 1061 ). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Connolly v. Scudder
neutral
1 sentence1932The exercise of the power of removal by the Governor requires a hearing. “ A hearing imports the presence of the accused, with full opportunity to cross-examine witnesses produced to support the charges, the right to be represented by counsel and to present witnesses to refute the charges.” (Matter of Connolly v. Scudder, 222 App. Div. 591, at p. 595 .) Justice to an accused public officer, by many decisions of the State in removal proceedings of local officers, has been held to require a fair trial, and one where the opportunity exists to be faced by the witnesses and subject the credibility | 1 | 1932–1932 |
Illinois Ex Rel. McNichols v. Pease
green
1 sentence1927Pro. sec. 827; McNichols v. Pease, 207 U. S. 100, p. 108 ); and refusing his warrant, the magistrate subsequently released the bail and discharged the prisoner. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Matter of Case
green
1 sentence1921Matter of Case, 214 N. Y. 199 . | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.