Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New York opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
GREATER NY HEALTH v. DeBuonogreen2 sentences2026Health Care Facilities Assn. v DeBuono , 91 NY2d 716, 721 ["we discern no distinction, for relation back purposes, between a proceeding commenced under (CPLR) article 78 and an action"]). 2013Thus, a stranger could not intervene in a pending proceeding to interpose an otherwise time-barred claim” ( 91 NY2d at 721 ). | 2 | 6 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||