Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New York opinions name it 3 courts 1997–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Vasquezgreen2 sentences2014Notably, “[t]he scope of conduct covered by the standards of inmate behavior is far broader than conduct subject to criminal sanctions under the Penal Law” (People v Vasquez, 89 NY2d 521, 532 [1997], cert denied sub nom. 2014Notably, “[t]he scope of conduct covered by the standards of inmate behavior is far broader than conduct subject to criminal sanctions under the Penal Law” (People v Vasquez, 89 NY2d 521, 532 [1997], cert denied sub nom. | 3 | 3 |
Mallen v. Hearing Officergreen2 sentences2014The misbehavior report, photograph of the knife and hearing testimony provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Mallen v Hearing Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, 304 AD2d 879, 879 [2003]). 2014The misbehavior report, photograph of the knife and hearing testimony provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Mallen v Hearing Officer, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, 304 AD2d 879, 879 [2003]). | 3 | 3 |
In re Patrick L.green1 sentence2009(Matter of Patrick L., 244 AD2d at 246; see Matter of Sean R., 33 AD3d at 926 .) Finally, the hearing officer found probable cause only that plaintiff “possessed a knife in violation of rule nine,” a condition of his parole. | 1 | 1 |
In re Sean R.green1 sentence2009(Matter of Patrick L., 244 AD2d at 246; see Matter of Sean R., 33 AD3d at 926 .) Finally, the hearing officer found probable cause only that plaintiff “possessed a knife in violation of rule nine,” a condition of his parole. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. McNamara
green
1 sentence2008(McNamara, supra; Finch, supra.) Accordingly, the second (superceding) count alleging defendant’s possession of a knife in violation of Administrative Code § 10-133 (b) is dismissed for facial insufficiency. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
People v. Finch
neutral
1 sentence2008(McNamara, supra; Finch, supra.) Accordingly, the second (superceding) count alleging defendant’s possession of a knife in violation of Administrative Code § 10-133 (b) is dismissed for facial insufficiency. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
United States v. Dixon
green
1 sentence1997Thus even when utilizing Justice Scalia’s application of the same elements test in Dixon (supra), the top counts of burglary in the first and second degrees and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree will survive. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.