Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 New York opinions name it 3 courts 2014–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Norcon Power Partners, L.P. v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.green2 sentences2024Ltd., 7 AD3d 412, 414 [1st Dept 2004] [explaining that repudiation of contract "discharg[ed] plaintiffs remaining contractual duties and g[ave] plaintiff a claim for damages for total breach"]; accord Norcon Power Partners, L.P. v Magara Mohawk Power Corp., 92 NY2d 458 , 462·463 [1998] ["repudiation entitles the nonrepudiating party to claim damages for total breach"]). 2020L.L.C. , 30 NY3d 127 , 133 [2017], quoting 10-54 Corbin on Contracts § 54.1 [2017]). "[W]hen a party repudiates contractual duties prior to the time designated for performance and before all of the consideration has been fulfilled, the repudiation entitles the nonrepudiating party to claim damages for total breach" ( Norcon Power Partners v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. , 92 NY2d 458, 462-463 [1998] [internal quotation marks [*4]omitted]). | 4 | 4 |
Princes Point LLC v. Muss Development L.L.C.green2 sentences2024Co., Inc. , 89 AD3d 1190, 1191 [3d Dept 2011] [citations omitted]; see Princes Point , 30 NY3d at 133; [*9]Children of Am. [Cortlandt Manor], LLC v Pike Plaza Assoc., LLC , 113 AD3d 583 , 585 [2d Dept 2014]), and, if established, "entitles the nonrepudiating party to claim damages for total breach" ( Long Is. 2024Co., Inc. , 89 AD3d 1190, 1191 [3d Dept 2011] [citations omitted]; see Princes Point , 30 NY3d at 133; [*9]Children of Am. [Cortlandt Manor], LLC v Pike Plaza Assoc., LLC , 113 AD3d 583 , 585 [2d Dept 2014]), and, if established, "entitles the nonrepudiating party to claim damages for total breach" ( Long Is. | 2 | 3 |
Joseph P. Carrara & Sons, Inc. v. A.R. Mack Construction Co.green2 sentences2024Co., Inc. , 89 AD3d 1190, 1191 [3d Dept 2011] [citations omitted]; see Princes Point , 30 NY3d at 133; [*9]Children of Am. [Cortlandt Manor], LLC v Pike Plaza Assoc., LLC , 113 AD3d 583 , 585 [2d Dept 2014]), and, if established, "entitles the nonrepudiating party to claim damages for total breach" ( Long Is. 2024Co., Inc. , 89 AD3d 1190, 1191 [3d Dept 2011] [citations omitted]; see Princes Point , 30 NY3d at 133; [*9]Children of Am. [Cortlandt Manor], LLC v Pike Plaza Assoc., LLC , 113 AD3d 583 , 585 [2d Dept 2014]), and, if established, "entitles the nonrepudiating party to claim damages for total breach" ( Long Is. | 2 | 2 |
Ergonomic Systems Philippines Inc. v. CCS International Ltd.green1 sentence2024Ltd., 7 AD3d 412, 414 [1st Dept 2004] [explaining that repudiation of contract "discharg[ed] plaintiffs remaining contractual duties and g[ave] plaintiff a claim for damages for total breach"]; accord Norcon Power Partners, L.P. v Magara Mohawk Power Corp., 92 NY2d 458 , 462·463 [1998] ["repudiation entitles the nonrepudiating party to claim damages for total breach"]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Children of America (Cortlandt Manor), LLC v. Pike Plaza Associates, LLC
green
2 sentences2024Co., Inc. , 89 AD3d 1190, 1191 [3d Dept 2011] [citations omitted]; see Princes Point , 30 NY3d at 133; [*9]Children of Am. [Cortlandt Manor], LLC v Pike Plaza Assoc., LLC , 113 AD3d 583 , 585 [2d Dept 2014]), and, if established, "entitles the nonrepudiating party to claim damages for total breach" ( Long Is. 2024Co., Inc. , 89 AD3d 1190, 1191 [3d Dept 2011] [citations omitted]; see Princes Point , 30 NY3d at 133; [*9]Children of Am. [Cortlandt Manor], LLC v Pike Plaza Assoc., LLC , 113 AD3d 583 , 585 [2d Dept 2014]), and, if established, "entitles the nonrepudiating party to claim damages for total breach" ( Long Is. | 2 | 2024–2024 |
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Carmosino
green
1 sentence2020With respect to the second prong of the test for a preliminary injunction, we likewise conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in determining that plaintiff established, by clear and convincing evidence, a danger of irreparable injury in the absence of injunctive relief ( see generally Nobu Next Door, LLC , 4 NY3d at 840 ; Eastman Kodak Co. , 77 AD3d at 1435 ). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Nobu Next Door, LLC v. Fine Arts Housing, Inc.
green
1 sentence2020With respect to the second prong of the test for a preliminary injunction, we likewise conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in determining that plaintiff established, by clear and convincing evidence, a danger of irreparable injury in the absence of injunctive relief ( see generally Nobu Next Door, LLC , 4 NY3d at 840 ; Eastman Kodak Co. , 77 AD3d at 1435 ). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.