temporary removal hearing (New York) · Go Syfert
← New York issues

temporary removal hearing in New York

6 New York opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
In re Mitchell WW.green
nyappdiv · 2010 · cited in 3 New York opinions naming this issue, 2014–2018
2 sentences

2014Under these particular circumstances, we find that respondent’s contentions regarding the temporary removal hearing are rendered moot (see Matter of Mitchell WW. [Andrew WW.], 74 AD3d 1409, 1411-1412 [2010]; Matter of Chelsea BB., 34 AD3d at 1088 ; Matter of Frank Y., 11 AD3d 740, 743 [2004]; compare Matter of Joseph DD., 300 AD2d 760, 766 [2002], lv denied 100 NY2d 504 [2003]).

2014Under these particular circumstances, we find that respondent’s contentions regarding the temporary removal hearing are rendered moot (see Matter of Mitchell WW. [Andrew WW.], 74 AD3d 1409, 1411-1412 [2010]; Matter of Chelsea BB., 34 AD3d at 1088 ; Matter of Frank Y., 11 AD3d 740, 743 [2004]; compare Matter of Joseph DD., 300 AD2d 760, 766 [2002], lv denied 100 NY2d 504 [2003]).

33
In re Frank Y.green
nyappdiv · 2004 · cited in 3 New York opinions naming this issue, 2014–2018
2 sentences

2014Under these particular circumstances, we find that respondent’s contentions regarding the temporary removal hearing are rendered moot (see Matter of Mitchell WW. [Andrew WW.], 74 AD3d 1409, 1411-1412 [2010]; Matter of Chelsea BB., 34 AD3d at 1088 ; Matter of Frank Y., 11 AD3d 740, 743 [2004]; compare Matter of Joseph DD., 300 AD2d 760, 766 [2002], lv denied 100 NY2d 504 [2003]).

2014Under these particular circumstances, we find that respondent’s contentions regarding the temporary removal hearing are rendered moot (see Matter of Mitchell WW. [Andrew WW.], 74 AD3d 1409, 1411-1412 [2010]; Matter of Chelsea BB., 34 AD3d at 1088 ; Matter of Frank Y., 11 AD3d 740, 743 [2004]; compare Matter of Joseph DD., 300 AD2d 760, 766 [2002], lv denied 100 NY2d 504 [2003]).

33
In re John S.green
nyappdiv · 2006 · cited in 3 New York opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014That contention has been rendered moot by the court’s subsequent finding of neglect (see Matter of Mary YY. [Albert YY.], 98 AD3d 1198 , 1198 [2012]), and the dispositional order (see Matter of John S., 26 AD3d 870, 870 [2006]).

2014That contention has been rendered moot by the court’s subsequent finding of neglect (see Matter of Mary YY. [Albert YY.], 98 AD3d 1198 , 1198 [2012]), and the dispositional order (see Matter of John S., 26 AD3d 870, 870 [2006]).

23
In re Joseph DD.green
nyappdiv · 2002 · cited in 2 New York opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Under these particular circumstances, we find that respondent’s contentions regarding the temporary removal hearing are rendered moot (see Matter of Mitchell WW. [Andrew WW.], 74 AD3d 1409, 1411-1412 [2010]; Matter of Chelsea BB., 34 AD3d at 1088 ; Matter of Frank Y., 11 AD3d 740, 743 [2004]; compare Matter of Joseph DD., 300 AD2d 760, 766 [2002], lv denied 100 NY2d 504 [2003]).

2014Under these particular circumstances, we find that respondent’s contentions regarding the temporary removal hearing are rendered moot (see Matter of Mitchell WW. [Andrew WW.], 74 AD3d 1409, 1411-1412 [2010]; Matter of Chelsea BB., 34 AD3d at 1088 ; Matter of Frank Y., 11 AD3d 740, 743 [2004]; compare Matter of Joseph DD., 300 AD2d 760, 766 [2002], lv denied 100 NY2d 504 [2003]).

22
In re Chelsea BB.green
nyappdiv · 2006 · cited in 2 New York opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014Under these particular circumstances, we find that respondent’s contentions regarding the temporary removal hearing are rendered moot (see Matter of Mitchell WW. [Andrew WW.], 74 AD3d 1409, 1411-1412 [2010]; Matter of Chelsea BB., 34 AD3d at 1088 ; Matter of Frank Y., 11 AD3d 740, 743 [2004]; compare Matter of Joseph DD., 300 AD2d 760, 766 [2002], lv denied 100 NY2d 504 [2003]).

2014Under these particular circumstances, we find that respondent’s contentions regarding the temporary removal hearing are rendered moot (see Matter of Mitchell WW. [Andrew WW.], 74 AD3d 1409, 1411-1412 [2010]; Matter of Chelsea BB., 34 AD3d at 1088 ; Matter of Frank Y., 11 AD3d 740, 743 [2004]; compare Matter of Joseph DD., 300 AD2d 760, 766 [2002], lv denied 100 NY2d 504 [2003]).

22
In re Elijah ZZ.green
nyappdiv · 2014 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018The entry of a final order following a fact-finding hearing in a Family Court Act article 10 proceeding, however, renders moot any challenge to the procedures employed at an antecedent temporary removal hearing where, as here, the final order is "predicated solely on evidence introduced at the fact-finding hearing" ( Matter of Mitchell WW. [Andrew WW.] , 74 AD3d 1409, 1411-1412 [3d Dept 2010]; see Matter of Elijah ZZ. [Freddie ZZ.], 118 AD3d 1172 , 1174 [3d Dept 2014]; Matter of Frank Y., 11 AD3d 740, 743 [3d Dept 2004]).

11
In re Unique R.green
nyappdiv · 2007 · cited in 1 New York opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018Contrary to the father's further contention, he is not aggrieved by—and thus cannot challenge—the court's dismissal of the petition against the mother (see Matter of Christian C.-B. [Christopher V.B.], 148 AD3d 1775 , 1775-1776 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 917 [2017]; Matter of Unique R., 43 AD3d 446, 446-447 [2d Dept 2007]; see generally CPLR 5511).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
In re Mary YY. neutral
nyappdiv · 2012
2 sentences

2014That contention has been rendered moot by the court’s subsequent finding of neglect (see Matter of Mary YY. [Albert YY.], 98 AD3d 1198 , 1198 [2012]), and the dispositional order (see Matter of John S., 26 AD3d 870, 870 [2006]).

2014That contention has been rendered moot by the court’s subsequent finding of neglect (see Matter of Mary YY. [Albert YY.], 98 AD3d 1198 , 1198 [2012]), and the dispositional order (see Matter of John S., 26 AD3d 870, 870 [2006]).

32014–2014
In re David VV. green
nyappdiv · 2006
2 sentences

2014The adjudication following fact-finding did not therefore rely, in any part, on the evidence adduced at the temporary removal hearing (compare Matter of Hannah YY., 50 AD3d at 1203 ; Matter of David VV., 25 AD3d at 883-884 ).

2014The adjudication following fact-finding did not therefore rely, in any part, on the evidence adduced at the temporary removal hearing (compare Matter of Hannah YY., 50 AD3d at 1203 ; Matter of David VV., 25 AD3d at 883-884 ).

22014–2014
In re Hannah YY. green
nyappdiv · 2008
2 sentences

2014The adjudication following fact-finding did not therefore rely, in any part, on the evidence adduced at the temporary removal hearing (compare Matter of Hannah YY., 50 AD3d at 1203 ; Matter of David VV., 25 AD3d at 883-884 ).

2014The adjudication following fact-finding did not therefore rely, in any part, on the evidence adduced at the temporary removal hearing (compare Matter of Hannah YY., 50 AD3d at 1203 ; Matter of David VV., 25 AD3d at 883-884 ).

22014–2014
C.-B., CHRISTIAN, MTR. OF green
nyappdiv · 2017
1 sentence

2018Contrary to the father's further contention, he is not aggrieved by—and thus cannot challenge—the court's dismissal of the petition against the mother (see Matter of Christian C.-B. [Christopher V.B.], 148 AD3d 1775 , 1775-1776 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 917 [2017]; Matter of Unique R., 43 AD3d 446, 446-447 [2d Dept 2007]; see generally CPLR 5511).

12018–2018
In re Christian C.-B. green
ny · 2017
1 sentence

2018Contrary to the father's further contention, he is not aggrieved by—and thus cannot challenge—the court's dismissal of the petition against the mother (see Matter of Christian C.-B. [Christopher V.B.], 148 AD3d 1775 , 1775-1776 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 917 [2017]; Matter of Unique R., 43 AD3d 446, 446-447 [2d Dept 2007]; see generally CPLR 5511).

12018–2018

Where else courts name it

KY 7 (2004–2026) NY 6 (2014–2018) WI 2 (1993–2021) IA 2 (2015–2018)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check