Wade-type hearing (New York) · Go Syfert
← New York issues

Wade-type hearing in New York

6 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Hopkinsgreen
nyappdiv · 2001 · cited in 3 New York opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015Even assuming, arguendo, that this was an identification proceeding within the meaning of CPL 710.30, we conclude that the two witnesses were familiar with defendant such that their identifications were confirmatory, and the court did not err in denying defendant’s request for a Wade-type hearing inasmuch as it would have been superfluous (see People v Hopkins, 284 AD2d 223, 223 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 902 [2001]).

2015Even assuming, arguendo, that this was an identification proceeding within the meaning of CPL 710.30, we conclude that the two witnesses were familiar with defendant such that their identifications were confirmatory, and the court did not err in denying defendant’s request for a Wade-type hearing inasmuch as it would have been superfluous (see People v Hopkins, 284 AD2d 223, 223 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 902 [2001]).

23
People v. Geegreen
ny · 2002 · cited in 3 New York opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015We reject that contention because the viewing of the videotape was not a police-arranged identification procedure (see People v Gee, 99 NY2d 158, 162-164 [2002], rearg denied 99 NY2d 652 [2003]).

2015We reject that contention because the viewing of the videotape was not a police-arranged identification procedure (see People v Gee, 99 NY2d 158, 162-164 [2002], rearg denied 99 NY2d 652 [2003]).

23

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Blackman green
nyappdiv · 1985
2 sentences

1997The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to hold a "Wade-type hearing” concerning identification procedures conducted by store security personnel (see, People v Vaughn, 169 AD2d 670 , lv denied 77 NY2d 1001 ; People v Blackman, 110 AD2d 596 ).

1992Further, we reject defendant’s contention that, under the circumstances of this case, he was entitled to a rr 'Wade-type hearing’ ” to determine the reliability of Nuchereno’s identifi cation testimony (People v Blackman, 110 AD2d 596, 597 , lv denied, 65 NY2d 813 ).

21992–1997
People v. Vaughn neutral
nyappdiv · 1991
1 sentence

1997The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to hold a "Wade-type hearing” concerning identification procedures conducted by store security personnel (see, People v Vaughn, 169 AD2d 670 , lv denied 77 NY2d 1001 ; People v Blackman, 110 AD2d 596 ).

11997–1997
People v. Ganci green
ny · 1971
2 sentences

1983However, the People’s tardy response stated: “There is no Wade issue as the complainants in this action have known the defendants for a substantial period of time.” Had the court been in possession of this response, said hearing which “consume[s] substantial amounts of time and contribute^] to the delays in processing criminal cases” (People v Ganci, 27 NY2d 418, 426 ) quite possibly would not have been ordered.

1983However, the People’s tardy response stated: “There is no Wade issue as the complainants in this action have known the defendants for a substantial period of time.” Had the court been in possession of this response, said hearing which “consume[s] substantial amounts of time and contribute^] to the delays in processing criminal cases” (People v Ganci, 27 NY2d 418, 426 ) quite possibly would not have been ordered.

11983–1983

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NY § N.Y. Penal Law § 125.25 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check