Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Williford
green
2 sentences2023State v. -34- Williford (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 247, 251 . 2008State v. Williford (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 247 , 251 . | 6 | 2004–2023 |
State v. Cooperrider
green
2 sentences2006State v. Cooperrider (1983), 4 Ohio St.3d 226 , 227 . {¶ 43} It is well settled that a criminal defendant is entitled to a complete and accurate jury instruction on all issues raised by the evidence. 2004State v. Cooperrider (1983), 4 Ohio St.3d 226 , 227 . {¶ 29} A review of the trial court's entire charge to the jury reveals that the jury was given the proper instruction for engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity. {¶ 30} It is well settled that a criminal defendant is entitled to a complete and accurate jury instruction on all issues raised by the evidence. | 2 | 2004–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.