Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State ex rel. Keith v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (Slip Opinion)green2 sentences2023Keith I at ¶ 23 (“Requiring the board to consider specific factors to determine the parolee’s fitness for release would not mean anything if the board is permitted to rely on incorrect, and therefore irrelevant, information about a particular candidate.”); State ex rel. 2022Keith v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 141 Ohio St.3d 375 , 2014-Ohio-4270 , 24 N.E.3d 1132, ¶ 23 (“Requiring the board to consider specific factors to determine the inmate’s fitness for release would not mean anything if the board is permitted to rely on incorrect, and therefore irrelevant, information about a particular candidate.”). {¶ 112} The court then applied these principles to the facts before it, and concluded that the inmates had failed to state a claim for relief in mandamus. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State ex rel. Henderson v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
green
2 sentences2014Requiring the board to consider specific factors to determine the inmate’s fitness for release would not mean anything if the board is permitted to rely on incorrect, and therefore irrelevant, information about a particular candidate. {¶ 24} Our decision today does not overrule the holding in Henderson, 81 Ohio St.3d 267 , 690 N.E.2d 887 , and similar cases. 2014Requiring the board to consider specific factors to determine the inmate’s fitness for release would not mean anything if the board is permitted to rely on incorrect, and therefore irrelevant, information about a particular candidate. {¶ 24} Our decision today does not overrule the holding in Henderson, 81 Ohio St.3d 267 , 690 N.E.2d 887 , and similar cases. | 4 | 2014–2019 |
State ex rel. Henderson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
green
2 sentences2019Our decision today does not overrule the holding in Henderson, 81 Ohio St.3d 267 , 1998 Ohio 631 , 690 N.E.2d 887 , and similar cases. 2017Our decision today does not overrule the holding in Henderson, 81 Ohio St.3d 267 , 1998 Ohio 631 , 690 N.E.2d 887 , and similar cases. | 3 | 2017–2019 |
State ex rel. Bailey v. Parole Bd. (Slip Opinions)
green
2 sentences2023Bailey v. Ohio Parole Bd., 152 Ohio St.3d 426 , 2017-Ohio-9202, ¶ 10 , citing Keith I at ¶ 23 (“[A]n inmate is not afforded meaningful parole consideration if the parole authority bases its decision on information in an inmate’s file that is substantively incorrect.”). 2023Bailey v. Ohio Parole Bd., 152 Ohio St.3d 426 , 2017-Ohio-9202, ¶ 10 , citing Keith I at ¶ 23 (“[A]n inmate is not afforded meaningful parole consideration if the parole authority bases its decision on information in an inmate’s file that is substantively incorrect.”). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.