Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Parma Heights v. Jarosgreen2 sentences2008Id., citing Parma Hts. v. Jaros (1990), 69 Ohio App.3d 623, 630 , 591 N.E.2d 726 ; State v. Speakman (Mar. 27, 2001), Pickaway App. No. 00CA035, 2001 WL 315198 . {¶ 45} Here, the court’s jury instructions, viewed as a whole, are not erroneous and conform to the offense charged in the indictment. 2008Id., citing Parma Hts. v. Jaros (1990), 69 Ohio App.3d 623, 630 , 591 N.E.2d 726 ; State v. Speakman (Mar. 27, 2001), Pickaway App. No. 00CA035, 2001 WL 315198 . {¶ 45} Here, the court’s jury instructions, viewed as a whole, are not erroneous and conform to the offense charged in the indictment. | 3 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Ward
green
1 sentence2014Generally, reversal is not warranted "due to error in the jury instructions unless the error is so prejudicial that it may induce an erroneous verdict." Id. {¶ 50} Here, TNT specifically points out three jury instructions that were erroneous. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Coe
green
1 sentence2008Id., citing Parma Hts. v. Jaros (1990), 69 Ohio App.3d 623, 630 , 591 N.E.2d 726 ; State v. Speakman (Mar. 27, 2001), Pickaway App. No. 00CA035, 2001 WL 315198 . {¶ 45} Here, the court’s jury instructions, viewed as a whole, are not erroneous and conform to the offense charged in the indictment. | 1 | 2008–2008 |