Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Blakemore v. Blakemoregreen1 sentence2013Blakemore v. Blakemore, 5 Ohio St.3d 217, 219 (1983). {¶ 15} In this case, the trial court granted Lawson's motion for relief from judgment -5- Warren CA2012-07-068 pursuant to Civ.R. 60(B)(5). | 1 | 1 |
Miklovic v. K. Dean Shira Constructiongreen2 sentences2012See In re Disqualification of Eyster, 105 Ohio St.3d 1246 , 2004-Ohio-7350 , 826 N.E.2d 304, ¶ 4 (a judge’s action — or inaction — on a motion is within the judge’s sound discretion and is not evidence of bias or prejudice). 2012See In re Disqualification of Eyster, 105 Ohio St.3d 1246 , 2004-Ohio-7350 , 826 N.E.2d 304, ¶ 4 (a judge’s action — or inaction — on a motion is within the judge’s sound discretion and is not evidence of bias or prejudice). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Schleegreen1 sentence2012See State v. Schlee, 117 Ohio St.3d 153 , 2008-Ohio-545 , 882 N.E.2d 431 , ¶ 12. {¶6} Postconviction relief was properly denied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. West
green
2 sentences2022Citing State v. West, 2017-Ohio-5596 , 93 N.E.3d 1221 (1st Dist.), where the First District applied Davis to a Crim.R. 32.1 motion, Lawson asks us to change our jurisprudence on this issue. 2022Citing State v. West, 2017-Ohio-5596 , 93 N.E.3d 1221 (1st Dist.), where the First District applied Davis to a Crim.R. 32.1 motion, Lawson asks us to change our jurisprudence on this issue. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Crangle
green
1 sentence2022Summit No. 25735, 2011-Ohio-5776 .1 Following the well-established case law precedents, therefore, we find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in denying Lawson’s motion on the ground that it lacked jurisdiction to consider her Crim.R. 32.1 motion after her conviction had been affirmed on direct appeal. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Dayton Bar Assn. v. Sullivan (Slip Opinion)
green
2 sentences2020On November 25, the trial court again rescheduled the jury trial for February 18, 2020. {¶ 6} On January 21, 2020, the Ohio Supreme Court suspended Lawson’s defense counsel from the practice of law for two years, with the second year stayed if he met certain conditions.1 See Dayton Bar Assn. v. Sullivan, 158 Ohio St.3d 423 , 2020-Ohio- 124, 144 N.E.3d 401 . 2020On November 25, the trial court again rescheduled the jury trial for February 18, 2020. {¶ 6} On January 21, 2020, the Ohio Supreme Court suspended Lawson’s defense counsel from the practice of law for two years, with the second year stayed if he met certain conditions.1 See Dayton Bar Assn. v. Sullivan, 158 Ohio St.3d 423 , 2020-Ohio- 124, 144 N.E.3d 401 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In re Disqualification of Solovan
green
1 sentence2012An affidavit of disqualification, however, “is not a vehicle to contest matters of substantive or procedural law.” In re Disqualification of Solovan, 100 Ohio St.3d 1214 , 2003-Ohio-5484 , 798 N.E.2d 3 , ¶ 4. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State ex rel. Montgomery v. Tri-State Group, Inc.
green
1 sentence2012An affidavit of disqualification, however, “is not a vehicle to contest matters of substantive or procedural law.” In re Disqualification of Solovan, 100 Ohio St.3d 1214 , 2003-Ohio-5484 , 798 N.E.2d 3 , ¶ 4. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. McSwain, Unpublished Decision (6-24-2004)
green
1 sentence2005State v. McSwain, Cuyahoga App. No. 83394, 2004-Ohio-3292 ; State v. Gooden, Cuyahoga App. No. 81320, 2003-Ohio-2864 . {¶ 29} Lawson's first and second assignments of error are overruled with respect to his conviction for aggravated robbery on count one. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.