party from assigning error (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

party from assigning error in Ohio

6 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
In Re Etter green
ohioctapp · 1998
2 sentences

2014“The waiver under [former] Juv.R. 40(E)(3)(b) embodies the long-recognized principle that the failure to draw the trial court’s attention to possible error, by objection or otherwise, when the error could have been corrected, results in a waiver of the issue for purposes of appeal.” In re Etter, 134 Ohio App.3d 484, 492 , 731 N.E.2d 694 (1st Dist. 1998).

2014“The waiver under [former] Juv.R. 40(E)(3)(b) embodies the long-recognized principle that the failure to draw the trial court’s attention to possible error, by objection or otherwise, when the error could have been corrected, results in a waiver of the issue for purposes of appeal.” In re Etter, 134 Ohio App.3d 484, 492 , 731 N.E.2d 694 (1st Dist. 1998).

22008–2014
Stafinsky v. Stafinsky green
ohioctapp · 1996
2 sentences

2000Stafinsky v. Stafinsky (1996), 116 Ohio App.3d 781 , 785 , fn. 3.

1999Stafinsky v. Stafinsky (1996), 116 Ohio App.3d 781 , 785 , fn. 3.

21999–2000
Goldfuss v. Davidson green
ohio · 1997
1 sentence

2008The plain error doctrine is applicable in civil cases only where the error "seriously affects the basic fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial process." Goldfuss v. Davidson , 79 Ohio St.3d 116 , 122-123 , 1997-Ohio-401 . *Page 6 {¶ 11} Here, the magistrate did not file a written decision in accordance with Civ.

12008–2008
Goldfuss v. Davidson green
ohio · 1997
1 sentence

2008The plain error doctrine is applicable in civil cases only where the error "seriously affects the basic fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial process." Goldfuss v. Davidson , 79 Ohio St.3d 116 , 122-123 , 1997-Ohio-401 . *Page 6 {¶ 11} Here, the magistrate did not file a written decision in accordance with Civ.

12008–2008
State v. Wolons green
ohio · 1989
1 sentence

2002State v. Wolons (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 64 . {¶ 50} A review of the record reveals that Jackson did not request an instruction on intervening cause, nor did he object to the failure to include that instruction at trial, and at a sidebar conference the court asked for additions or deletions to the charge but the defense expressed its satisfaction. {¶ 51} Crim.R. 30 precludes a party from assigning as error the failure to give jury instructions unless a timely objection has been made in the trial court.

12002–2002

Where else courts name it

RI 7 (1975–1985) OH 6 (1999–2014) NC 3 (1990–2002) UT 2 (1987–1991)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check