substance of the proposed instruction (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

substance of the proposed instruction in Ohio

6 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Youssef v. Parr, Inc. green
ohioctapp · 1990
2 sentences

2002The court need only include the substance of the proposed instruction." Id ., 69 Ohio App.3d at 691 , 591 N.E.2d at 770 .

2002The court need only include the substance of the proposed instruction." Id ., 69 Ohio App.3d at 691 , 591 N.E.2d at 770 .

42000–2013
Deffinbaugh v. Ohio Turnpike Commission green
ohioctapp · 1990
2 sentences

2002"The failure to give a requested jury instruction is not reversible error if the law is expressed to the jury clearly and fairly enough to enable the jury to understand the law as it applies to the facts in the case." Reese v. Euclid Cleaning Contrs., Inc . (1995), 103 Ohio App.3d 141 , 147-48 , 658 N.E.2d 1096 , 1100 (citing Deffinbaugh v. Ohio Turnpike Comm . (1990), 67 Ohio App.3d 692 , 701-702 , 588 N.E.2d 189 , 194-195 ); see, also, Morford , supra .

2002"The failure to give a requested jury instruction is not reversible error if the law is expressed to the jury clearly and fairly enough to enable the jury to understand the law as it applies to the facts in the case." Reese v. Euclid Cleaning Contrs., Inc . (1995), 103 Ohio App.3d 141 , 147-48 , 658 N.E.2d 1096 , 1100 (citing Deffinbaugh v. Ohio Turnpike Comm . (1990), 67 Ohio App.3d 692 , 701-702 , 588 N.E.2d 189 , 194-195 ); see, also, Morford , supra .

12002–2002
Reese v. Euclid Cleaning Contractors, Inc. neutral
ohioctapp · 1995
2 sentences

2002"The failure to give a requested jury instruction is not reversible error if the law is expressed to the jury clearly and fairly enough to enable the jury to understand the law as it applies to the facts in the case." Reese v. Euclid Cleaning Contrs., Inc . (1995), 103 Ohio App.3d 141 , 147-48 , 658 N.E.2d 1096 , 1100 (citing Deffinbaugh v. Ohio Turnpike Comm . (1990), 67 Ohio App.3d 692 , 701-702 , 588 N.E.2d 189 , 194-195 ); see, also, Morford , supra .

2002"The failure to give a requested jury instruction is not reversible error if the law is expressed to the jury clearly and fairly enough to enable the jury to understand the law as it applies to the facts in the case." Reese v. Euclid Cleaning Contrs., Inc . (1995), 103 Ohio App.3d 141 , 147-48 , 658 N.E.2d 1096 , 1100 (citing Deffinbaugh v. Ohio Turnpike Comm . (1990), 67 Ohio App.3d 692 , 701-702 , 588 N.E.2d 189 , 194-195 ); see, also, Morford , supra .

12002–2002
Jenkins v. Clark green
ohioctapp · 1982
2 sentences

1990Echols v. Vernick (June 11, 1987), Cuyahoga App. No. 52101, unreported, at 3, 1987 WL 12603 ; Jenkins v. Clark (1982), 7 Ohio App.3d 93 , 7 OBR 124, 454 N.E.2d 541 , paragraph five of the syllabus.

1990Echols v. Vernick (June 11, 1987), Cuyahoga App. No. 52101, unreported, at 3, 1987 WL 12603 ; Jenkins v. Clark (1982), 7 Ohio App.3d 93 , 7 OBR 124, 454 N.E.2d 541 , paragraph five of the syllabus.

11990–1990
State v. Nelson green
ohio · 1973
2 sentences

1988State v. Nelson (1973), 36 Ohio St. 2d 79 , 65 O.O. 2d 222, 303 N.E. 2d 865 , paragraph one of the syllabus.

1988State v. Nelson (1973), 36 Ohio St. 2d 79 , 65 O.O. 2d 222, 303 N.E. 2d 865 , paragraph one of the syllabus.

11988–1988

Where else courts name it

IN 17 (2003–2020) NE 15 (1996–2026) OH 6 (1988–2013) ID 5 (1983–2004) CA 4 (1964–2018) AZ 3 (1983–2018) MN 3 (1993–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check