Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McBride v. Ford Motor Co.green2 sentences1992In addition, this Court has stated that “[t]he refusal to give a particular requested instruction is not erroneous where the substance of the proposed instruction is covered elsewhere in the instructions given.” McBride v. Ford Motor Co., 105 Idaho 753, 760 , 673 P.2d 55, 62 (1983). 1992In addition, this Court has stated that “[t]he refusal to give a particular requested instruction is not erroneous where the substance of the proposed instruction is covered elsewhere in the instructions given.” McBride v. Ford Motor Co., 105 Idaho 753, 760 , 673 P.2d 55, 62 (1983). | 2 | 3 |
Garrett v. Noblesgreen2 sentences1992McBride v. Ford Motor Co., 105 Idaho 753 , 673 P.2d 55 (1983); Garrett v. Nobles, 102 Idaho 369 , 630 P.2d 656 (1981). 1992McBride v. Ford Motor Co., 105 Idaho 753 , 673 P.2d 55 (1983); Garrett v. Nobles, 102 Idaho 369 , 630 P.2d 656 (1981). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Watson v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.
green
2 sentences2004As discussed above, “the refusal to give a particular requested instruction is not erroneous where the substance of the proposed instruction is covered elsewhere in the instructions given.” Watson, 121 Idaho at 665 , 827 P.2d at 678 . 2004As discussed above, “the refusal to give a particular requested instruction is not erroneous where the substance of the proposed instruction is covered elsewhere in the instructions given.” Watson, 121 Idaho at 665 , 827 P.2d at 678 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Mann v. Gonzales
green
2 sentences1983See Garrett v. Nobles, 102 Idaho 369 , 630 P.2d 656 (1981); Mann v. Gonzales, 100 Idaho 769 , 605 P.2d 947 (1980). 1983See Garrett v. Nobles, 102 Idaho 369 , 630 P.2d 656 (1981); Mann v. Gonzales, 100 Idaho 769 , 605 P.2d 947 (1980). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.