Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oklahoma opinions name it 1 courts 1973–1977 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Warren v. State
green
2 sentences1975Warren v. State, Okl.Cr., 495 P.2d 837 .” In his third assignment of error, defendant Williams asserts as error the refusal of the trial court to admit into evidence the video tape statement he gave on November 3, 1973, wherein he exonerated himself from involvement in the subject offense and attributed the commission thereof to defendant Justus. 1974Warren v. State, Okl.Cr., 495 P.2d 837 . | 5 | 1973–1975 |
Lambert v. State
neutral
1 sentence1977Lambert v. State, Okl.Cr., 471 P.2d 935 (1970). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Fowler v. State
green
1 sentence1973Fowler v. State, Okl.Cr., 512 P.2d 238 , and Warren v. State, Okl.Cr., 495 P.2d 837 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |