6 Oklahoma opinions name it 1 courts 1912–1981 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tulsa Municipal Airport Trust v. National Gypsum Co.
green
1 sentence1981Our decision today is based on the particular facts of this case, for we are not unmindful of the rule of reasonableness in mitigation indicated in 12A O.S.1971 § 2-715 and detailed in Bailey v. Roebuck Co., 135 Okl. 216 , 275 P. 329 (1929) and Tulsa Municipal Airport Trust v. National Gypsum Co., 551 P.2d 304 (Okl.App.1976), certiorari denied June 15, 1976. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Bailey v. J. L. Roebuck Co.
neutral
2 sentences1981Our decision today is based on the particular facts of this case, for we are not unmindful of the rule of reasonableness in mitigation indicated in 12A O.S.1971 § 2-715 and detailed in Bailey v. Roebuck Co., 135 Okl. 216 , 275 P. 329 (1929) and Tulsa Municipal Airport Trust v. National Gypsum Co., 551 P.2d 304 (Okl.App.1976), certiorari denied June 15, 1976. 1981Our decision today is based on the particular facts of this case, for we are not unmindful of the rule of reasonableness in mitigation indicated in 12A O.S.1971 § 2-715 and detailed in Bailey v. Roebuck Co., 135 Okl. 216 , 275 P. 329 (1929) and Tulsa Municipal Airport Trust v. National Gypsum Co., 551 P.2d 304 (Okl.App.1976), certiorari denied June 15, 1976. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Cochran v. Sullivan
green
2 sentences1941This requirement, however, finds its basis in statutory provisions (see Cochran v. Sullivan, 94 Okla. 23 , 220 P. 870 ; sec. 12762, O. 1941This requirement, however, finds its basis in statutory provisions (see Cochran v. Sullivan, 94 Okla. 23 , 220 P. 870 ; sec. 12762, O. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Faeth Co. v. Bressie
neutral
1 sentence1935The defendant in error asserts that the taking possession under the chattel mortgage does not constitute a sale in violation of the Bulk Sales Law, and in support of this theory relies upon a Kansas case, Faeth v. Bressie et al., 125 Kan. 425 , 264 P. 1077 . | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Hancock v. Youree
green
2 sentences1916Hancock v. Youree, 25 Okla. 460 , 106 Pac. 841 ; Tolbert v. State Bank, 30 Okla. 403 , 121 Pac. 212 . 1916Hancock v. Youree, 25 Okla. 460 , 106 Pac. 841 ; Tolbert v. State Bank, 30 Okla. 403 , 121 Pac. 212 . | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Tolbert v. State Bank of Paden
neutral
2 sentences1916Hancock v. Youree, 25 Okla. 460 , 106 Pac. 841 ; Tolbert v. State Bank, 30 Okla. 403 , 121 Pac. 212 . 1916Hancock v. Youree, 25 Okla. 460 , 106 Pac. 841 ; Tolbert v. State Bank, 30 Okla. 403 , 121 Pac. 212 . | 1 | 1916–1916 |
Lessee of Gantly v. Ewing
neutral
1 sentence1914Gantly v. Ewing, 44 U. S. [3 How.] 707, 11 L. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Thompson v. Ogle
neutral
1 sentence1912In Thompson v. Ogle, 55 Ark. 101 , 17 S. W. 583 , it is said: “In a case in which the defendant failed to claim his exemptions before sale, on account of absence in attendance upon a sick family, the Supreme Court of California held that- the sale was no bar to his claim. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Haswell v. Parsons
green
1 sentence1912Haswell v. Parsons, 15 Cal. 266 . | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.