sale violation (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

sale violation in Pennsylvania

6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 4 courts 1914–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
City of Easton v. Marragreen
pacommwct · 2004 · cited in 1 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019Section 607(d) & (e) of the RETSL, 72 P.S. § 5860.607 (d) & (e) (objections to a tax sale may question the legality of the bureau’s proceedings in respect to such sale and if the trial court sustains an objection it “shall, by its order or decree, invalidate the sale and order another sale to be held in conformity with this act at such time and under such conditions as it shall fix.”); see also City of Easton v. Marra, 862 A.2d 170, 172-73 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2004) (upholding court order to stay tax sale pursuant to the act known as the Municipal Claims and Tax Liens Act, Act of May 16, 1923, P.L. 20

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
McCabe, D. v. Marywood University green
pasuperct · 2017
1 sentence

2020Id. at ,Mf63, 64.2 Count VI of the Third Amended Counterclaim charges the Bank with bad faith. 14, ,I,r?1 and 72. • • I � Count VII charges the Bank with mail fraud in connection with the Sheriff's sale in violation of 1' 8 U.S.C. §1341 .

12020–2020
White v. Keystone Insurance green
pasuperct · 2001
1 sentence

2019We noted that the sale of the bar to the insured was not yet complete, and that the insured did not have a profit motive at the time of the shooting because he “was not engaged in the operation of the business and, thus, he did not secure any profit or earnings by protecting the assets or employees of the bar.” Id.

12019–2019
Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc. green
pa · 2004
2 sentences

2008Id. at 500 , 854 A.2d at 438 .

2008Id. at 500 , 854 A.2d at 438 .

12008–2008
Pearsoll v. Chapin green
pa · 1863
1 sentence

1947“This requires the word ‘void’ in section 3 to be construed as ‘voidable’, (Seylar v. Carson, 69 Pa. 81, 87 ; Pearsoll v. Chapin, 44 Pa. 9, 15 ) but a reading of the entire act permits of no other construction: Dickinson v. Harbison, 78 N. J.

11947–1947
Seylar v. Carson neutral
pa · 1872
1 sentence

1947“This requires the word ‘void’ in section 3 to be construed as ‘voidable’, (Seylar v. Carson, 69 Pa. 81, 87 ; Pearsoll v. Chapin, 44 Pa. 9, 15 ) but a reading of the entire act permits of no other construction: Dickinson v. Harbison, 78 N. J.

11947–1947
Gibbon v. Arronson neutral
pasuperct · 1922
1 sentence

1947It is accordingly held that the seller may recover the price, though the sale was in violation of the act.” In Rubin v. Goldberg et al., 18 D. & C. 371, it was held: “Failure of a vendor to furnish his vendee with a statement of the names and addresses of all the former creditors, in accordance with the provisions of the Sales in Bulk Act of May 23,1919, P. L. 262, does not entitle the vendee to a decree cancelling the transaction, the purpose of the statute being to protect the vendors’ creditors, and the sale under such circumstances being not void but only voidable at the election of those

11947–1947
Breisch v. Coxe green
pa · 1876
1 sentence

1914The appellants’ counsel urge that the case of Breisch v. Coxe, 81 Pa. 336 , controls the questions now before us.

11914–1914

Where else courts name it

IL 53 (1869–2025) TX 23 (1911–2026) NY 22 (1862–2013) CA 22 (1916–2023) MO 15 (1902–2018) MI 10 (1924–2009) MD 9 (1922–2024) FL 8 (1963–2024) LA 8 (1880–2003) IA 7 (1871–2018) AL 7 (1888–1982) OK 6 (1912–1981) GA 6 (1907–2014) NC 6 (1912–2011) PA 6 (1914–2020) VA 6 (1910–2000) KS 6 (1923–2021) WI 5 (1890–2006) NJ 5 (1961–1990) IN 5 (1868–1957) TN 5 (1913–2022) MA 5 (1894–2011) ND 5 (1897–2011) AR 4 (1891–2001) MN 4 (1915–2004) CT 4 (1906–1976) NV 4 (1997–2022) AZ 4 (1981–2021) UT 4 (2013–2019) CO 3 (1903–2009) OR 3 (1906–2014) NH 2 (1925–2008) SC 2 (1922–1997) AK 2 (1985–1990) WA 2 (1913–1928) KY 2 (1910–1933) NE 2 (1914–2016) OH 2 (2002–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check