sale violation (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

sale violation in North Carolina

6 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1912–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Carlsen v. Zanegreen
calctapp · 1968 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
2 sentences

1983See Carlsen v. Zane, 261 Cal. App. 2d 399 , 67 Cal. Rptr. 747 (1968); see also Annot., 88 A.L.R. 2d 936 (1963) for more cases so holding.

1983See Carlsen v. Zane, 261 Cal. App. 2d 399 , 67 Cal. Rptr. 747 (1968); see also Annot., 88 A.L.R. 2d 936 (1963) for more cases so holding.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Freeman v. . Hill neutral
nc · 1836
2 sentences

1916Freeman v. Hill, 21 N. C., 389 . ...

1912Freeman v. Hill, 21 N. C., 389.

21912–1916
Bolz v. Myers green
mont · 1982
1 sentence

2011Id.

12011–2011
Joel T. Cheatham, Inc. v. Hall green
ncctapp · 1983
2 sentences

1989Id. at 681-682 , 308 S.E. 2d at 459 .

1989Id. at 681-682 , 308 S.E. 2d at 459 .

11989–1989
Wm. R. Moore Dry Goods Co. v. Rowe & Carithers neutral
miss · 1910
1 sentence

1913In construing a similar statute, tbe Supreme Court of Mississippi in Dry Goods Co. v. Rowe, 99 Miss., 30 , held that “a sale in violation of tbe bulk sales law, declaring that sale of a stock of merchandise in bulk shall be presumed to be fraudulent as against tbe seller’s creditors, unless specified conditions are complied with, is prima facie fraudulent, and unless tbe purchaser shows a compliance with tbe conditions as to inventory and notice to creditors, tbe sale is absolutely void, tbe word presumed baying no fixed meaning, and in one instance the pre *261 sumption declared may be only p

11913–1913

Where else courts name it

IL 53 (1869–2025) TX 23 (1911–2026) NY 22 (1862–2013) CA 22 (1916–2023) MO 15 (1902–2018) MI 10 (1924–2009) MD 9 (1922–2024) FL 8 (1963–2024) LA 8 (1880–2003) IA 7 (1871–2018) AL 7 (1888–1982) OK 6 (1912–1981) GA 6 (1907–2014) NC 6 (1912–2011) PA 6 (1914–2020) VA 6 (1910–2000) KS 6 (1923–2021) WI 5 (1890–2006) NJ 5 (1961–1990) IN 5 (1868–1957) TN 5 (1913–2022) MA 5 (1894–2011) ND 5 (1897–2011) AR 4 (1891–2001) MN 4 (1915–2004) CT 4 (1906–1976) NV 4 (1997–2022) AZ 4 (1981–2021) UT 4 (2013–2019) CO 3 (1903–2009) OR 3 (1906–2014) NH 2 (1925–2008) SC 2 (1922–1997) AK 2 (1985–1990) WA 2 (1913–1928) KY 2 (1910–1933) NE 2 (1914–2016) OH 2 (2002–2016)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check