6 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wolff v. McDonnellgreen2 sentences1974See, Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 US 539 , 94 S Ct 2963 , 41 L Ed 2d 935 (1974), where the court held, inter alia, that 24 hours’ written advance notice of a prison disciplinary hearing was sufficient notice to meet minimum due process. 1974See, Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 US 539 , 94 S Ct 2963 , 41 L Ed 2d 935 (1974), where the court held, inter alia, that 24 hours’ written advance notice of a prison disciplinary hearing was sufficient notice to meet minimum due process. | 3 | 4 |
Bartholomew v. Reedgreen2 sentences1983The rule was designed to approximate normal adjudicatory due process as closely as consistent with this special risk of the prison setting, in response to the United States District Court’s decision in Bartholomew v. Reed, 477 F Supp 223, 227-28 (D Or 1979) modified on other grounds sub nom Bartholomew v. Watson, 665 F2d 915 (9th Cir 1982). 1983The rule was designed to approximate normal adjudicatory due process as closely as consistent with this special risk of the prison setting, in response to the United States District Court's decision in Bartholomew v. Reed, 477 F. Supp. 223, 227-28 (D.Or. 1979) modified on other grounds sub nom Bartholomew v. Watson, 665 F.2d 915 (9th Cir.1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Archuletta v. Oregon Women's Correctional Center
green
2 sentences2007Indeed, this court has previously characterized the circumstances of a prison disciplinary hearing as essentially "civil in nature." Archuletta v. OWCC, 25 Or.App. 149, 152 , 548 P.2d 1006 (1976). 2007Indeed, this court has previously characterized the circumstances of a prison disciplinary hearing as essentially "civil in nature." Archuletta v. OWCC, 25 Or.App. 149, 152 , 548 P.2d 1006 (1976). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Grisel v. Oregon State Penitentiary
green
2 sentences1983Is there hearsay on hearsay involved? 6 In Grisel v. OSP, 290 Or 719, 721 , 625 P2d 651 , cert den 454 US 846 (1981), a 4-3 court decided in effect that the credibility of the informant could be established by the bare assertion “I received information from an informant * * * whose information has proven reliable in the past * * I agree that it is necessary to overrule Grisel, recognizing that such a mere conclusion is insufficient even in a prison disciplinary hearing. 7 I find further support for overruling Grisel because of the incongruent use of the terms “reliable” and “credible” in the a 1983Is there hearsay on hearsay involved? 6 In Grisel v. OSP, 290 Or 719, 721 , 625 P2d 651 , cert den 454 US 846 (1981), a 4-3 court decided in effect that the credibility of the informant could be established by the bare assertion “I received information from an informant * * * whose information has proven reliable in the past * * I agree that it is necessary to overrule Grisel, recognizing that such a mere conclusion is insufficient even in a prison disciplinary hearing. 7 I find further support for overruling Grisel because of the incongruent use of the terms “reliable” and “credible” in the a | 1 | 1983–1983 |
cluster 397442
green
1 sentence1983The rule was designed to approximate normal adjudicatory due process as closely as consistent with this special risk of the prison setting, in response to the United States District Court's decision in Bartholomew v. Reed, 477 F. Supp. 223, 227-28 (D.Or. 1979) modified on other grounds sub nom Bartholomew v. Watson, 665 F.2d 915 (9th Cir.1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Flora v. Marzulli
green
1 sentence1983Is there hearsay on hearsay involved? [6] In Grisel v. OSP, 290 Or. 719, 721 , 625 P.2d 651 , cert. den. 454 U.S. 846 , 102 S.Ct. 164 , 70 L.Ed.2d 134 (1981), a 4-3 court decided in effect that the credibility of the informant could be established by the bare assertion "I received information from an informant * * * whose information has proven reliable in the past * * *." I agree that it is necessary to overrule Grisel, recognizing that such a mere conclusion is insufficient even in a prison disciplinary hearing. [7] I find further support for overruling Grisel because of the incongruent use | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Andrisani v. Maxon Industries, Inc.
green
1 sentence1983Is there hearsay on hearsay involved? [6] In Grisel v. OSP, 290 Or. 719, 721 , 625 P.2d 651 , cert. den. 454 U.S. 846 , 102 S.Ct. 164 , 70 L.Ed.2d 134 (1981), a 4-3 court decided in effect that the credibility of the informant could be established by the bare assertion "I received information from an informant * * * whose information has proven reliable in the past * * *." I agree that it is necessary to overrule Grisel, recognizing that such a mere conclusion is insufficient even in a prison disciplinary hearing. [7] I find further support for overruling Grisel because of the incongruent use | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Washington v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1983Is there hearsay on hearsay involved? 6 In Grisel v. OSP, 290 Or 719, 721 , 625 P2d 651 , cert den 454 US 846 (1981), a 4-3 court decided in effect that the credibility of the informant could be established by the bare assertion “I received information from an informant * * * whose information has proven reliable in the past * * I agree that it is necessary to overrule Grisel, recognizing that such a mere conclusion is insufficient even in a prison disciplinary hearing. 7 I find further support for overruling Grisel because of the incongruent use of the terms “reliable” and “credible” in the a 1983Is there hearsay on hearsay involved? [6] In Grisel v. OSP, 290 Or. 719, 721 , 625 P.2d 651 , cert. den. 454 U.S. 846 , 102 S.Ct. 164 , 70 L.Ed.2d 134 (1981), a 4-3 court decided in effect that the credibility of the informant could be established by the bare assertion "I received information from an informant * * * whose information has proven reliable in the past * * *." I agree that it is necessary to overrule Grisel, recognizing that such a mere conclusion is insufficient even in a prison disciplinary hearing. [7] I find further support for overruling Grisel because of the incongruent use | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Bonney v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, CORR. DIV.
green
2 sentences1978See Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 US 539 , 94 S Ct 2963 , 41 L Ed 2d 935 (1974); Bonney v. OSP, 270 Or 79 , 526 P2d 1020 (1974); Bekins v. OSP, 19 Or App 11 , 526 P2d 629 (1974). 1978See Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 US 539 , 94 S Ct 2963 , 41 L Ed 2d 935 (1974); Bonney v. OSP, 270 Or 79 , 526 P2d 1020 (1974); Bekins v. OSP, 19 Or App 11 , 526 P2d 629 (1974). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Bekins v. OREGON ST. PENITENTIARY, CORR. DIV.
green
2 sentences1978See Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 US 539 , 94 S Ct 2963 , 41 L Ed 2d 935 (1974); Bonney v. OSP, 270 Or 79 , 526 P2d 1020 (1974); Bekins v. OSP, 19 Or App 11 , 526 P2d 629 (1974). 1978See Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 US 539 , 94 S Ct 2963 , 41 L Ed 2d 935 (1974); Bonney v. OSP, 270 Or 79 , 526 P2d 1020 (1974); Bekins v. OSP, 19 Or App 11 , 526 P2d 629 (1974). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Bonney v. Oregon State Penitentiary, Cor. Div.
green
1 sentence1974Bonney, 16 Or App at 519 ; Wolff, 418 US at 569-70 , 41 L Ed 2d at 959 . | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.