prison disciplinary hearing (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

prison disciplinary hearing in Colorado

6 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Kodama v. Johnsongreen
colo · 1990 · cited in 4 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1990–1995
2 sentences

1995Kodama v. Johnson, 786 P.2d 417 (Colo.1990).

1995See Kodama v. Johnson, 786 P.2d 417 (Colo.1990).

24
Mariani v. Colorado Department of Correctionsgreen
coloctapp · 1997 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025The due process rights applicable to a prison disciplinary hearing are (1) advance written notice of the charged violations of the disciplinary code; (2) a written statement by the hearing officer giving reasons for the hearing and the evidence relied upon; and (3) the right to call witnesses and present evidence “when doing so does not interfere with the security and order of the institution.” Mariani v. Colo. Dep’t of Corr., 956 P.2d 625, 628 (Colo. App. 1997). 6 B.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Villa v. Gunter green
coloctapp · 1993
1 sentence

2006Similarly, in Villa v. Gunter, 862 P.2d 1033 (Colo.App.1993), on review under C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4), a division of this court remanded for a new hearing where a factual question existed regarding whether an inmate in a prison disciplinary hearing was denied the opportunity to call a witness who had information relevant to his defense.

12006–2006

Where else courts name it

NY 291 (1974–2025) WA 16 (1978–2026) AL 16 (1988–2008) VT 13 (2001–2026) NV 12 (2013–2015) IL 10 (1980–2022) NJ 8 (1975–2019) CA 7 (1975–2024) PA 7 (2003–2023) KS 7 (1984–2022) CO 6 (1990–2025) OR 6 (1974–2007) MI 6 (1978–2015) WI 6 (1988–2019) TX 5 (1992–2016) KY 5 (2005–2023) OH 5 (1998–2022) IA 4 (2006–2011) CT 4 (1999–2004) MD 3 (1989–2003) AK 3 (1980–2018) NE 3 (1993–1998) FL 3 (1980–2003) NM 3 (2002–2017) TN 3 (2002–2016) ND 3 (1978–1998) AZ 2 (2020–2020) MN 2 (2016–2016) MS 2 (1998–2000) IN 2 (1979–2024) MA 2 (1997–1998) MO 2 (1992–2008)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check