Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Vermont opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Herring v. Gorczykgreen2 sentences2026On “judicial review of the sufficiency of evidence at a prison disciplinary hearing, the hearing officer’s final determination must be upheld if it is supported by ‘some evidence’ in the record.” Herring v. Gorczyk, 173 Vt. 240, 243 , 789 A.2d 955, 958 (2001); see also LaFaso v. Patrissi, 161 Vt. 46, 49 (1993) (describing “the appropriate standard for judicial review of the actions of prison authorities”). “[A]ny evidence” supporting the disciplinary board’s conclusion satisfies the “some evidence” standard. 2026On “judicial review of the sufficiency of evidence at a prison disciplinary hearing, the hearing officer’s final determination must be upheld if it is supported by ‘some evidence’ in the record.” Herring v. Gorczyk, 173 Vt. 240, 243 , 789 A.2d 955, 958 (2001); see also LaFaso v. Patrissi, 161 Vt. 46, 49 (1993) (describing “the appropriate standard for judicial review of the actions of prison authorities”). “[A]ny evidence” supporting the disciplinary board’s conclusion satisfies the “some evidence” standard. | 6 | 12 |
LaFaso v. Patrissigreen2 sentences2026On “judicial review of the sufficiency of evidence at a prison disciplinary hearing, the hearing officer’s final determination must be upheld if it is supported by ‘some evidence’ in the record.” Herring v. Gorczyk, 173 Vt. 240, 243 , 789 A.2d 955, 958 (2001); see also LaFaso v. Patrissi, 161 Vt. 46, 49 (1993) (describing “the appropriate standard for judicial review of the actions of prison authorities”). “[A]ny evidence” supporting the disciplinary board’s conclusion satisfies the “some evidence” standard. 2025Further, on “judicial review of the sufficiency of evidence at a prison disciplinary hearing, the hearing officer’s final determination must be upheld if it is supported by ‘some evidence’ in the record.” Herring v. Gorczyk, 173 Vt. 240, 243 , 789 A.2d 955, 958 (2001); see also LaFaso v. Patrissi, 161 Vt. 46, 49 , 633 A.2d 695, 697 (1993) (describing “the appropriate standard for judicial review of the actions of prison authorities”). | 5 | 6 |
Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. Hillgreen2 sentences2023“On judicial review of the sufficiency of evidence at a prison disciplinary hearing, the hearing officer’s final determination must be upheld if it is supported by ‘some evidence’ in the record.” Herring, 173 Vt. at 243 (quoting Hill, 472 U.S. at 455 ). 2012“On judicial review of the sufficiency of evidence at a prison disciplinary hearing, the hearing officer’s final determination must be upheld if it is supported by ‘some evidence’ in the record.” Herring, 173 Vt. at 243 (quoting Hill, 472 U.S. at 455 ). | 2 | 6 |
In Re Grievance of Troysegreen2 sentences2014Welfare, 153 Vt. 479, 486-87 , 572 A.2d 1342, 1346 (1990) (holding in appeal from Human Services Board that “[t]his Court will set aside the clearly erroneous findings of an administrative board, but where the record contains any credible evidence to fairly and reasonably support the findings, the board’s decision will stand”); In re Troyse, 142 Vt. 612, 616 , 460 A.2d 469, 471-72 (1983) (holding in appeal from Labor Relations- Board that “administrative findings shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and they will not be so found if there is any credible evidence fairly and reasonab 2014Welfare, 153 Vt. 479, 486-87 , 572 A.2d 1342, 1346 (1990) (holding in appeal from Human Services Board that “[t]his Court will set aside the clearly erroneous findings of an administrative board, but where the record contains any credible evidence to fairly and reasonably support the findings, the board’s decision will stand”); In re Troyse, 142 Vt. 612, 616 , 460 A.2d 469, 471-72 (1983) (holding in appeal from Labor Relations- Board that “administrative findings shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and they will not be so found if there is any credible evidence fairly and reasonab | 2 | 2 |
Hall v. Department of Social Welfaregreen2 sentences2014Welfare, 153 Vt. 479, 486-87 , 572 A.2d 1342, 1346 (1990) (holding in appeal from Human Services Board that “[t]his Court will set aside the clearly erroneous findings of an administrative board, but where the record contains any credible evidence to fairly and reasonably support the findings, the board’s decision will stand”); In re Troyse, 142 Vt. 612, 616 , 460 A.2d 469, 471-72 (1983) (holding in appeal from Labor Relations- Board that “administrative findings shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and they will not be so found if there is any credible evidence fairly and reasonab 2014Welfare, 153 Vt. 479, 486-87 , 572 A.2d 1342, 1346 (1990) (holding in appeal from Human Services Board that “[t]his Court will set aside the clearly erroneous findings of an administrative board, but where the record contains any credible evidence to fairly and reasonably support the findings, the board’s decision will stand”); In re Troyse, 142 Vt. 612, 616 , 460 A.2d 469, 471-72 (1983) (holding in appeal from Labor Relations- Board that “administrative findings shall not be set aside unless clearly erroneous, and they will not be so found if there is any credible evidence fairly and reasonab | 2 | 2 |
Favreau v. Department of Employment & Traininggreen2 sentences2014See Herring v. Gorczyk, 173 Vt. 240, 243 , 789 A.2d 955, 958 (2001) (“On judicial review of the sufficiency of evidence at a prison disciplinary hearing, the hearing officer’s final determination must be upheld if it is supported by some evidence in the record.” (quotation omitted)); Favreau v. Dep’t of Emp’t & Training, 156 Vt. 572, 577 , 594 A.2d 440, 443 (1991) (holding in appeal from Employment Security Board that “[o]ur function on appeal is not to weigh the evidence anew as a trier of fact but to determine if the Board’s findings and con.1usions are supported by credible evidence”); Hall 2014See Herring v. Gorczyk, 173 Vt. 240, 243 , 789 A.2d 955, 958 (2001) (“On judicial review of the sufficiency of evidence at a prison disciplinary hearing, the hearing officer’s final determination must be upheld if it is supported by some evidence in the record.” (quotation omitted)); Favreau v. Dep’t of Emp’t & Training, 156 Vt. 572, 577 , 594 A.2d 440, 443 (1991) (holding in appeal from Employment Security Board that “[o]ur function on appeal is not to weigh the evidence anew as a trier of fact but to determine if the Board’s findings and con.1usions are supported by credible evidence”); Hall | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.