Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oregon opinions name it 1 courts 1898–1981 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fitch v. Howittgreen2 sentences1959It is further argued: “Also, nonlienable items which were included in the lien were the very considerable items of unused material left on the job.” We quote from Fitch v. Howitt, 32 Or 396, 409 , 52 P 192 : “All the material so provided by Beach having been lienable, he had a right to file his claim for the full amount so supplied, which it must be presumed was used in the building; for it cannot be expected that a materialman would be obliged to watch the progress of a structure, to see that every stick of timber or other material so supplied by him was used therein, and if the owner would d 1959It is further argued: “Also, nonlienable items which were included in the lien were the very considerable items of unused material left on the job.” We quote from Fitch v. Howitt, 32 Or 396, 409 , 52 P 192 : “All the material so provided by Beach having been lienable, he had a right to file his claim for the full amount so supplied, which it must be presumed was used in the building; for it cannot be expected that a materialman would be obliged to watch the progress of a structure, to see that every stick of timber or other material so supplied by him was used therein, and if the owner would d | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jenkins v. National Surety Co.
green
2 sentences1981"The general rule is that a surety may not claim subrogation against an insolvent debtor until the claims of creditors against the debtor have been paid in full. * * * In Jenkins v. National Surety Company, 277 U.S. 258 , 48 S. Ct. 445, 446 , 72 L. 1981"The general rule is that a surety may not claim subrogation against an insolvent debtor until the claims of creditors against the debtor have been paid in full. * * * In Jenkins v. National Surety Company, 277 U.S. 258 , 48 S. Ct. 445, 446 , 72 L. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Lough v. State Industrial Accident Commission
green
2 sentences1944This construction has been given in many cases when the term injury is used in the statute instead of the term accident as now employed in the Oregon statute, although a contrary construction was given in the case of Lough v. State Industrial Accident Commission, 104 Or. 313 , 207 P. 354 . 1944This construction has been given in many cases when the term injury is used in the statute instead of the term accident as now employed in the Oregon statute, although a contrary construction was given in the case of Lough v. State Industrial Accident Commission, 104 Or. 313 , 207 P. 354 . | 1 | 1944–1944 |
Grants Pass Trust Co. v. Enterprise Mining Co.
green
2 sentences1915Co., 58 Or. 174 ( 113 Pac. 859 , 34 L. 1915Co., 58 Or. 174 ( 113 Pac. 859 , 34 L. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Harrisburg Lumber Co. v. Washburn
green
1 sentence1898The conclusion here reached is not in conflict with the opinion announced in the case of Harrisburg Lumber Company v. Washburn, 29 Or. 150 ( 44 Pac. 890 ); for in that case it was admitted that a portion of the material for which the plaintiff sought to enforce a lien against a church was furnished to be used in the construction of a sidewalk around the lots upon which, the building: was erected, thus showing that the purpose for which the material was supplied rendered it nonlienable as against the church. | 1 | 1898–1898 |
Ghinaglia v. Domenech
neutral
1 sentence1898The conclusion here reached is not in conflict with the opinion announced in the case of Harrisburg Lumber Company v. Washburn, 29 Or. 150 ( 44 Pac. 890 ); for in that case it was admitted that a portion of the material for which the plaintiff sought to enforce a lien against a church was furnished to be used in the construction of a sidewalk around the lots upon which, the building: was erected, thus showing that the purpose for which the material was supplied rendered it nonlienable as against the church. | 1 | 1898–1898 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.