Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2021Consequently, we will consider Appellant’s claims, applying the following standard of review: “In reviewing the propriety of an order granting or denying PCRA relief, an appellate court is limited to ascertaining whether the record supports the determination of the PCRA court and whether the ruling is free of legal error.” Commonwealth v. Johnson, … 966 A.2d 523, 532 ([Pa.] 2009). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Bakergreen1 sentence2020Commonwealth v. Baker, 72 A.3d 652, 662 (Pa. Super. 2013) (citation omitted). -2- J-S22030-20 The briefing requirement for the allowance of appeal is set forth in Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f) as follows: An appellant who challenges the discretionary aspects of a sentence in a criminal matter shall set forth in his brief a concise statement of the reasons relied upon for allowance of appeal with respect to the discretionary aspects of a sentence. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Whitegreen2 sentences1997Although Edmunds does not require litigants to use this briefing framework, our Supreme Court has stated that such analysis "may be helpful to address the concerns listed....” Commonwealth v. White, 543 Pa. 45, 50 , 669 A.2d 896, 899 (1995). 6 . 1997Although Edmunds does not require litigants to use this briefing framework, our Supreme Court has stated that such analysis "may be helpful to address the concerns listed....” Commonwealth v. White, 543 Pa. 45, 50 , 669 A.2d 896, 899 (1995). 6 . | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Colbertgreen2 sentences1988See Commonwealth v. Colbert, 476 Pa. 531 , 534-35 n. 1, 383 A.2d 490 , 491-92 n. 1 (1978) (claim waived when no argument presented in appellate brief). 1988See Commonwealth v. Colbert, 476 Pa. 531 , 534-35 n. 1, 383 A.2d 490 , 491-92 n. 1 (1978) (claim waived when no argument presented in appellate brief). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Com. v. Snook, J.
green
1 sentence2024In a dispute over the terms of a plea agreement, “[a]ny ambiguities … will be construed against the Government.” Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Commonwealth v. Touw
green
1 sentence2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.