Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLPgreen2 sentences2023See In re Akin Gump, LLP, 252 S.W.3d at 495 . 2023See In re Akin Gump, LLP, 252 S.W.3d at 495 . | 3 | 3 |
City of Houston v. Christopher Rhulegreen1 sentence2025However, we may not find a briefing waiver of an immunity issue as we have an independent obligation “to ascertain that subject matter jurisdiction exists regardless of whether the parties have questioned it,” City of Houston v. Rhule, 417 S.W.3d 440, 442 (Tex. 2013), and to “address a governmental immunity argument even when raised for the first time on appeal.” El Paso 14 Indep. | 1 | 1 |
Nobility Homes of Texas, Inc. v. Shiversgreen1 sentence2021See Nobility Homes of Tex., Inc. v. Shivers, 557 S.W.2d 77, 83 (Tex. 1977) (affirming judgment when party failed to challenge a separate and independent ground for recovery). | 1 | 1 |
In Re ELYgreen1 sentence2018See D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d at 297 ; see also In re E.L.Y., 69 S.W.3d 838, 842 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, order) (per curiam) (holding Anders briefs in termination appeals must comply with Rule 38.1). | 1 | 1 |
Burrus v. Reyesgreen1 sentence2018We do not, especially considering that (1) materiality often involves case- specific determinations that are not always easily amenable to factual analogy, Burrus, 516 S.W.3d at 188 (materiality of terms are determined on case-by-case basis); (2) Flores is ostensibly distinguishable because that case involved a meeting-of-the-minds failure based on a rules ambiguity that was combined with a lack of an employer’s signature 7 and a failure to sufficiently define the scope of the arbitration agreement vis-à-vis a second collective bargaining agreement 6 The dissent distinguishes Hogg from this ca | 1 | 1 |
In Re DASgreen1 sentence2018See D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d at 297 ; see also In re E.L.Y., 69 S.W.3d 838, 842 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, order) (per curiam) (holding Anders briefs in termination appeals must comply with Rule 38.1). | 1 | 1 |
Connors v. Connorsgreen1 sentence2015Appellee cites Connors v. Connors, 796 S.W.2d 233, 236-37 (Tex. App.— Fort Worth 1990, writ denied) as authority for Appellant committing a briefing waiver on Appellant’s fourth issue. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Malooly Brothers, Inc. v. Napier
green
1 sentence2019John we reaffirmed our application of the briefing waiver implications of Malooly Brothers, Inc. v. Napier, 461 S.W.2d 119 (Tex. 1970) beyond summary judgments. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Saldana v. Garcia
green
1 sentence1996Tex.R.App.P. 74(f); Saldana v. Garcia, 285 S.W.2d at 200-01 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.