Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1995–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Flemming v. Nestorgreen2 sentences2024See [Hudson] (noting that a monetary fine does not constitute an affirmative restraint because such a sanction is “certainly nothing approaching the infamous punishment of imprisonment” (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 617 , . . . (1960))); id. (“[T]he payment of fixed or variable sums of money [is a] sanction which ha[s] been recognized as [enforceable] by civil proceedings since the original revenue law of 1789.”[11] (second and third alterations in original) (quoting Helvering . . . , 303 U.S. [at] 400, . . . (1938))). 11 Act of July 31, 1789, c. 2024See [Hudson] (noting that a monetary fine does not constitute an affirmative restraint because such a sanction is “certainly nothing approaching the infamous punishment of imprisonment” (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 617 , . . . (1960))); id. (“[T]he payment of fixed or variable sums of money [is a] sanction which ha[s] been recognized as [enforceable] by civil proceedings since the original revenue law of 1789.”[11] (second and third alterations in original) (quoting Helvering . . . , 303 U.S. [at] 400, . . . (1938))). 11 Act of July 31, 1789, c. | 1 | 1 |
Fisher v. Hillgreen1 sentence2019These include the transaction or occurrence giving rise to liability, Fisher v. Hill, 81 A.2d 860, 864 (Pa. 1951); the fundamental issues, Stevenson v. Silverman, 208 A.2d 786, 788 (Pa. 1965); the evidence necessary to prevail, Robinson v. Fye, 192 A.3d 1225, 1231 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2018); and the type of relief requested, Tobias v. Halifax Twp., 28 A.3d 223, 227 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2011), appeal denied, 47 A.3d 849 (Pa. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
M.A. Robinson v. Officer Fyegreen1 sentence2019These include the transaction or occurrence giving rise to liability, Fisher v. Hill, 81 A.2d 860, 864 (Pa. 1951); the fundamental issues, Stevenson v. Silverman, 208 A.2d 786, 788 (Pa. 1965); the evidence necessary to prevail, Robinson v. Fye, 192 A.3d 1225, 1231 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2018); and the type of relief requested, Tobias v. Halifax Twp., 28 A.3d 223, 227 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2011), appeal denied, 47 A.3d 849 (Pa. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Stevenson v. Silvermangreen1 sentence2019These include the transaction or occurrence giving rise to liability, Fisher v. Hill, 81 A.2d 860, 864 (Pa. 1951); the fundamental issues, Stevenson v. Silverman, 208 A.2d 786, 788 (Pa. 1965); the evidence necessary to prevail, Robinson v. Fye, 192 A.3d 1225, 1231 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2018); and the type of relief requested, Tobias v. Halifax Twp., 28 A.3d 223, 227 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2011), appeal denied, 47 A.3d 849 (Pa. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Tobias v. HALIFAX TOWNSHIPgreen1 sentence2019These include the transaction or occurrence giving rise to liability, Fisher v. Hill, 81 A.2d 860, 864 (Pa. 1951); the fundamental issues, Stevenson v. Silverman, 208 A.2d 786, 788 (Pa. 1965); the evidence necessary to prevail, Robinson v. Fye, 192 A.3d 1225, 1231 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2018); and the type of relief requested, Tobias v. Halifax Twp., 28 A.3d 223, 227 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2011), appeal denied, 47 A.3d 849 (Pa. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Com. v. Norton, H., Jr.green1 sentence2018Id. at 143-144 (cleaned up). -5- J-S24006-18 As to the first and second factors, Cook’s testimony was necessary and essential to the Commonwealth’s case. | 1 | 1 |
Doe v. Stategreen1 sentence2014See Doe v. State, 189 P.3d 999, 1018 (Alaska 2008) (concluding that six of the Kennedy factors weighed in favor of finding the statute punitive); Wallace v. State, 905 N.E.2d 371, 384 (Ind.2009) (concluding that six of the seven factors weighed in favor of finding the statute punitive); State v. Letalien, 985 A.2d 4, 24 (Me.2009) (concluding the first and second factors weighed in favor of finding the statute punitive); Doe v. Dep't of Pub. | 1 | 1 |
Wallace v. Stategreen1 sentence2014See Doe v. State, 189 P.3d 999, 1018 (Alaska 2008) (concluding that six of the Kennedy factors weighed in favor of finding the statute punitive); Wallace v. State, 905 N.E.2d 371, 384 (Ind.2009) (concluding that six of the seven factors weighed in favor of finding the statute punitive); State v. Letalien, 985 A.2d 4, 24 (Me.2009) (concluding the first and second factors weighed in favor of finding the statute punitive); Doe v. Dep't of Pub. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Letaliengreen1 sentence2014See Doe v. State, 189 P.3d 999, 1018 (Alaska 2008) (concluding that six of the Kennedy factors weighed in favor of finding the statute punitive); Wallace v. State, 905 N.E.2d 371, 384 (Ind.2009) (concluding that six of the seven factors weighed in favor of finding the statute punitive); State v. Letalien, 985 A.2d 4, 24 (Me.2009) (concluding the first and second factors weighed in favor of finding the statute punitive); Doe v. Dep't of Pub. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Thomas F. Worthy v. The City of Phenix City, Alabama
green
1 sentence2024See [Hudson] (noting that a monetary fine does not constitute an affirmative restraint because such a sanction is “certainly nothing approaching the infamous punishment of imprisonment” (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Flemming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 617 , . . . (1960))); id. (“[T]he payment of fixed or variable sums of money [is a] sanction which ha[s] been recognized as [enforceable] by civil proceedings since the original revenue law of 1789.”[11] (second and third alterations in original) (quoting Helvering . . . , 303 U.S. [at] 400, . . . (1938))). 11 Act of July 31, 1789, c. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
In re C.W.U.
green
1 sentence2021Id. at 71–72. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Yandrich v. Radic
green
2 sentences1995On appeal, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania upheld the Superior Court’s decision based on the holding in Sinn, supra. In so holding, the court found that “Since the first and second factors of the three pronged foreseeability test set forth in Sinn are totally lacking here ... relief cannot be granted.” Yandrich, 495 Pa. at 247 , 433 A.2d at 461 . 1995On appeal, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania upheld the Superior Court’s decision based on the holding in Sinn, supra. In so holding, the court found that “Since the first and second factors of the three pronged foreseeability test set forth in Sinn are totally lacking here ... relief cannot be granted.” Yandrich, 495 Pa. at 247 , 433 A.2d at 461 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Mazzagatti v. Everingham by Everingham
green
2 sentences1995The court’s second opportunity came in the case of Mazzagatti v. Everingham by Everingham, 512 Pa. 266 , 516 A.2d 672 (1986). 1995The court’s second opportunity came in the case of Mazzagatti v. Everingham by Everingham, 512 Pa. 266 , 516 A.2d 672 (1986). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.