Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
James v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authoritygreen1 sentence2024Thus, we do not further explore Section 32. 147 See, e.g., James, 477 A.2d at 1305 (“James’ challenge ... is also grounded on the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Art. | 1 | 1 |
Cb v. Psgreen2 sentences2020See Commonwealth v. Harding, 37 A.3d 1235 (Pa. Super. 2011)(unpublished memorandum). -4- J-S32040-20 Commonwealth v. James, 37 A.3d 1235 (Pa. Super. 2011). 2020See Commonwealth v. Harding, 37 A.3d 1235 (Pa. Super. 2011)(unpublished memorandum). -4- J-S32040-20 Commonwealth v. James, 37 A.3d 1235 (Pa. Super. 2011). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Lairdgreen1 sentence2019See Laird, supra at 978 ; Robinson, supra at 439 . -6- | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. James
green
1 sentence2025Id. at 190 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Commonwealth v. Small, E., Aplt.
green
1 sentence2020In sum, because the PCRA court did not err in concluding that the letter allegedly written by Harding was not of such a nature and character that it would compel a different result, Small, supra, James’ issue fails, and we affirm the PCRA court’s order denying him post-conviction relief. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Commonwealth v. Robinson
green
1 sentence2019See Laird, supra at 978 ; Robinson, supra at 439 . -6- | 1 | 2019–2019 |
James v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
green
2 sentences1984The trial court determined that SEPTA had not received the required notice and granted SEPTA’s motion for summary judgment without addressing James’ claim that the notice statute violated “equal protection of the law, due process of law, and the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and the Constitution of Pennsylvania.” A panel of Superior Court, 312 Pa.Superior Ct. 512, 459 A.2d 338 , reversed, Judge Wieand dissenting, holding that the six month notice requirement of the Metropolitan Transportation Authorities Act violated the equal pr 1984The trial court determined that SEPTA had not received the required notice and granted SEPTA's motion for summary judgment without addressing James' claim that the notice statute violated "equal protection of the law, due process of law, and the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and the Constitution of Pennsylvania." A panel of Superior Court, 312 Pa.Superior Ct. 512, 459 A.2d 338 , reversed, Judge Wieand dissenting, holding that the six month notice requirement of the Metropolitan Transportation Authorities Act violated the equal pr | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Thoma v. Thoma
neutral
1 sentence1983The lower court granted James’s exception to the alimony pendente lite based on the authority of a recent panel decision of this Court: Thoma v. Thoma, 284 Pa.Superior Ct. 249, 425 A.2d 797 (1981). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.