paternity by estoppel seeks to protect doctrine (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

paternity by estoppel seeks to protect doctrine in Pennsylvania

5 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2014–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
T.E.B. v. C.A.B.green
pasuperct · 2013 · cited in 5 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2014–2016
2 sentences

2016T.E.B. v. C.A.B., 74 A.3d 170, 173 (Pa.Super.2013).

2016T.E.B. v. C.A.B., 74 A.3d 170, 173 (Pa.Super.2013).

45

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check