Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
New York v. Burgergreen2 sentences2019See Burger, 482 U.S. at 702 , 107 S. Ct. at 2644 . 2019See Burger, 482 U.S. at 702 , 107 S. Ct. at 2644 . | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Maldonadogreen1 sentence2019In other words, the Burger criteria are applied generally to a statutory scheme, not to a given set of facts arising under that scheme.”5 United States v. Maldonado, 356 F.3d 130, 136 (1st 4 In response, the Commonwealth posits that the Team’s inspection program was constitutional because it met all three prongs of the Burger/Petroll test. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Clarkgreen1 sentence2004As we have previously stated, the final prong of the Horton/McCullum exception “runs squarely against the cases of Commonwealth v. Petroll, 558 Pa. 565 , 738 A.2d 993 (1999), and Commonwealth v. Colon, 777 A.2d 1097 (Pa.Super.2001).” Commonwealth v. Clark, 802 A.2d 658, 660 (Pa.Super.2002). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Petroll
green
2 sentences2019We contemplated those provisions during our application of the three-part Burger/Petroll test, but we offered no explanation as to why or how these provisions factored into the criteria established by the Supreme Court for determining whether an industry is “closely regulated.” We did not consider (in any manner, let alone comprehensively) the quantity of regulations applicable to “trucking,” nor did we identify or contemplate the nature of any other statutes or regulations in an effort to ascertain whether those provisions, federal or state, amounted to an “intricate web of regulatory scrutin 2004As we have previously stated, the final prong of the Horton/McCullum exception “runs squarely against the cases of Commonwealth v. Petroll, 558 Pa. 565 , 738 A.2d 993 (1999), and Commonwealth v. Colon, 777 A.2d 1097 (Pa.Super.2001).” Commonwealth v. Clark, 802 A.2d 658, 660 (Pa.Super.2002). | 2 | 2004–2019 |
Doe v. City of San Diego
green
1 sentence2019Commonwealth’s Brief at 32. 5 Citing to Doe v. City of San Diego, 198 F.Supp.3d 1153 (S.D. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Commonwealth v. McCree
green
1 sentence2005After a discussion of *869 the latter case and others which followed, we stated “[w]e are constrained to apply the Ellis/Petroll exception.” McCree, 857 A.2d at 191 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Commonwealth v. Colon
green
1 sentence2004As we have previously stated, the final prong of the Horton/McCullum exception “runs squarely against the cases of Commonwealth v. Petroll, 558 Pa. 565 , 738 A.2d 993 (1999), and Commonwealth v. Colon, 777 A.2d 1097 (Pa.Super.2001).” Commonwealth v. Clark, 802 A.2d 658, 660 (Pa.Super.2002). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.