Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ryan v. Workman's Compensation Appeal Boardgreen2 sentences2024For example, in Ryan v. Workm[e]n’s Compensation Appeal Board (Community Health Services), 707 A.2d 1130, 1131 (Pa. 1998), a claimant who was involved in a work-related automobile accident later suffered a psychological injury upon learning that she was being sued by the driver of the other vehicle in the accident. 2022Id. at 1135 . | 3 | 5 |
Murphy v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardgreen2 sentences2024Murphy, 110 A.3d at 237 . 2017Murphy, 110 A.3d at 234 (citing Bartholetti v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (School District of Philadelphia), 927 A.2d 743, 746 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2007)). | 1 | 2 |
Gulick v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardgreen2 sentences2024Id.; see Gulick v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Pepsi Cola Operating Co.), 711 A.2d 585, 588-89 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998) (rejecting application of the physical-mental standard where the evidence showed that the claimant’s mental illness was not caused by or aggravated by his physical injury, but by the employer filing a termination petition). 2024Id.; see Gulick v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Pepsi Cola Operating Co.), 711 A.2d 585, 588-89 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998) (rejecting application of the physical-mental standard where the evidence showed that the claimant’s mental illness was not caused by or aggravated by his physical injury, but by the employer filing a termination petition). | 1 | 1 |
Frankiewicz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Kinder Morgan, Inc.)green1 sentence2023Appeal Bd. (Kinder Morgan, Inc.), 177 A.3d 991, 996 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017) (quoting Murphy v. Workers’ Comp. | 1 | 1 |
Bartholetti v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardgreen1 sentence2017Murphy, 110 A.3d at 234 (citing Bartholetti v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (School District of Philadelphia), 927 A.2d 743, 746 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2007)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Anderson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
green
2 sentences2017There, the claimant worked in a group home for mentally and physically challenged young adults and filed a claim petition alleging that she sustained a work-related mental injury as a result of, inter alia, a client “pulling at [her] hair and pulling at [her] blouse.” Anderson, 862 A.2d at 681 . 2017See Murphy, 110 A.3d at 238 ; Anderson, 862 A.2d at 683 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Donovan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
green
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Pittsburgh Board of Education v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
green
2 sentences2017Id. 2017Schulz, 840 A.2d at 1079-80 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.