Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1849–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Culmergreen2 sentences1995Commonwealth v. Culmer, 413 Pa.Super. 203, 212 , 604 A.2d 1090, 1094-1095 (1992). 1995Commonwealth v. Culmer, 413 Pa.Super. 203, 212 , 604 A.2d 1090, 1094-1095 (1992). | 3 | 3 |
Commonwealth v. Buksagreen2 sentences2005Commonwealth v. Buksa, 440 Pa.Super. 305 , 655 A.2d 576, 579-580 (1995), appeal denied, 544 Pa. 642 , 664 A.2d 972 (1995). ¶ 22 The court’s limitation of or failure to allow cross-examination of the prosecution’s witness to reveal possible bias of this nature will require a new trial, unless the error did not control the outcome of the case. 2005Commonwealth v. Buksa, 440 Pa.Super. 305 , 655 A.2d 576, 579-580 (1995), appeal denied, 544 Pa. 642 , 664 A.2d 972 (1995). ¶ 22 The court’s limitation of or failure to allow cross-examination of the prosecution’s witness to reveal possible bias of this nature will require a new trial, unless the error did not control the outcome of the case. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hospital v. Philadelphia County
green
1 sentence1911After quoting from the opinion in Christ Church Hospital v. Philadelphia, 24 Pa. 229 , the chief justice says (p. 70): “We have here, succinctly stated, the principle upon which the doctrine rests in its application to a warrant for the collection of taxes. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Hauer's Appeal
neutral
1 sentence1849It comes not, therefore, within the principle upon which the doctrine of Hauer’s Appeal, 5 W. & S. 473 , and other similar cases, is based. | 1 | 1849–1849 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.