Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 2019–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Grecogreen2 sentences2020Recently, in Commonwealth v. Greco, 203 A.3d 1120, 1123 (Pa.Super. 2019), this Court held that Greco’s petition seeking a determination whether he was required to register pursuant to -5- J-S48009-19 SORNA after Muniz had to be treated as a PCRA petition. 2019See Commonwealth v. Greco, 203 A.3d 1120, 1123 (Pa. Super. 2019) (holding that a post-conviction claim that an original sentence is illegal due to the retroactive application of a sexual offender registration requirement must be raised in a PCRA petition). | 5 | 5 |
Commonwealth v. Murphygreen2 sentences2020In Commonwealth v. Murphy, 180 A.3d 402, 405-06 (Pa.Super. 2018), we held that a post-conviction claim that a sentence is illegal due to the retroactive application of a sexual offender registration requirement must be raised in a PCRA petition. 2019See Commonwealth v. Greco, 203 A.3d 1120, 1123 (Pa. Super. 2019); Commonwealth v. Murphy, 180 A.3d 402, 405-406 (Pa. Super. 2018). | 2 | 2 |
Com. v. Kerns, S.green1 sentence2021See Kerns, 220 A.3d at 613 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.