Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1983–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sands v. Pa. Ins. Guaranty Ass'nred2 sentences1999In the former statute, a “covered claim” was defined as “an unpaid claim, including a claim for unearned premiums, which arises under a property and casualty insurance policy of an insolvent insurer . . . .” 40 P.S. §1701.103(5)(a) (repealed December 12, 1994). . 283 Pa. Super. 217, 224 , 423 A.2d 1224, 1227 (1980). . 1999In the former statute, a “covered claim” was defined as “an unpaid claim, including a claim for unearned premiums, which arises under a property and casualty insurance policy of an insolvent insurer . . . .” 40 P.S. §1701.103(5)(a) (repealed December 12, 1994). . 283 Pa. Super. 217, 224 , 423 A.2d 1224, 1227 (1980). . | 2 | 3 |
Bell v. Slezakgreen2 sentences2007While the Superior Court is correct that we have continued to cite Sands, see, e.g., Bell, 812 A.2d at 570-71 , we have done so for truly *208 “general propositions.” In Bell , for example, we cited Sands in support of our articulation of the PPCIGA's purposes, id. at 570, and in support of the proposition that “[t]he PPCIGA Act and its predecessor were derived from a model, uniform law.” Id. at 571. 2007While the Superior Court is correct that we have continued to cite Sands, see, e.g., Bell, 812 A.2d at 570-71 , we have done so for truly *208 “general propositions.” In Bell , for example, we cited Sands in support of our articulation of the PPCIGA's purposes, id. at 570, and in support of the proposition that “[t]he PPCIGA Act and its predecessor were derived from a model, uniform law.” Id. at 571. | 2 | 2 |
Bullock v. Parisergreen2 sentences1999Id. . 311 Pa. Super. 487, 494 , 457 A.2d 1287, 1290 (1983). . 40 P.S. §991.1817(a). (emphasis added) . 1999Id. . 311 Pa. Super. 487, 494 , 457 A.2d 1287, 1290 (1983). . 40 P.S. §991.1817(a). (emphasis added) . | 2 | 2 |
Carrozza v. Greenbaumgreen1 sentence2005See id. at 375 n. 6; 40 P.S. § 991.1802. 5 Specifically, PPCIGA is obligated “to pay covered claims existing prior [to] the determination of the insolvency, arising within thirty (30) days after the determination of insolvency” or before the policy is expired or replaced. 40 P.S. § 991.1803(b)(l)(i). 6 At issue in this case is whether UHS’s claims were claims “existing” prior to PHICO’s insolvency or “arising” within 30 days of the Liquidation Order. ¶ 9 Because of the manner in which the Guaranty Act interacts with the Liquidation Act, however, also at issue is whether UHS’s claims are “cover | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.