Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1924–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wesco Distribution, Inc. v. Westport Group, Inc.green1 sentence2015See Wesco Distrib., 150 S.W.3d at 558 ; Balli, 558 S.W.2d at 518-19 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McFarland v. Shaw
green
2 sentences1977The Commission of Appeals of Texas in McFarland v. Shaw, 45 S.W.2d 193 (Tex. Com.App.1932, holding approved) in construing a statute substantially the same as our present § 37, supra, said in part 45 S.W.2d at page 198 : Our Supreme Court has established a well-settled rule that heirs, devisees or legatees who receive property belonging to an estate, against which an unpaid claim exists, do not thereby become personally liable to the claimant for the value of the property so received; the remedy being to enforce the statutory lien against the property in their hands. 1977The Commission of Appeals of Texas in McFarland v. Shaw, 45 S.W.2d 193 (Tex. Com.App.1932, holding approved) in construing a statute substantially the same as our present § 37, supra, said in part 45 S.W.2d at page 198 : Our Supreme Court has established a well-settled rule that heirs, devisees or legatees who receive property belonging to an estate, against which an unpaid claim exists, do not thereby become personally liable to the claimant for the value of the property so received; the remedy being to enforce the statutory lien against the property in their hands. | 2 | 1953–1977 |
Sikes v. Zuloaga
green
1 sentence2020Id. iii. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
In Re Medina
green
1 sentence2016See id. §§ 53.083(b), 53.084(b); Medina, 413 B.R. at 592 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Texas Construction Associates, Inc. v. Balli
green
1 sentence2015See Wesco Distrib., 150 S.W.3d at 558 ; Balli, 558 S.W.2d at 518-19 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
WMC v. Wiga
green
2 sentences2015Ass’n, 225 P.3d 1061 (2010) 2010 WY 21 .... (c) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, the association: .... (iv) Is not obligated to pay a claimant an amount in excess of the obligation of the insolvent insurer under the policy or coverage from which the claim arises. [¶ 22] Section 26–31–103(a)(ii) defines a “covered claim” for purposes of the Act as follows: (ii) “Covered claim” means an unpaid claim which arises out of and is within the coverage and does not exceed the applicable limits of an insurance policy to which this chapter applies issued by an insurer, if the insurer is an 2015Ass’n, 225 P.3d 1061 (2010) 2010 WY 21 .... (c) Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, the association: .... (iv) Is not obligated to pay a claimant an amount in excess of the obligation of the insolvent insurer under the policy or coverage from which the claim arises. [¶ 22] Section 26–31–103(a)(ii) defines a “covered claim” for purposes of the Act as follows: (ii) “Covered claim” means an unpaid claim which arises out of and is within the coverage and does not exceed the applicable limits of an insurance policy to which this chapter applies issued by an insurer, if the insurer is an | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Mosher Mfg. Co. v. Equitable Surety Co.
green
1 sentence1924App.) 229 S. W. 318 , be an exception, the holding of the Supreme Court, as well as the Courts of Civil Appeals of this state, are uniform that bonds of this character, and embracing similar terms as the one under inquiry, are indemnity bonds only, and executed for the sole benefit of the owner, and that neither a materialman nor -a laborer can maintain a suit on same to recover an unpaid claim. | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.