pendency hearing in Rhode Island

6 Rhode Island opinions name it 2 courts 1963–2010 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Cugini v. Chiaradiogreen ri · 1963 · cited in 3 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 2001–2010 2 sentences 2007Additionally, "the right to be heard `is withoutmeaning unless such notice of the pendency of a hearing or proceeding is adequate in the circumstances to safeguard the right.'" Id. (quoting Cugini v. Chiaradio , 96 R.I. 120 , 125 , 189 A.2d 798 , 801 (1963)). 2007Additionally, "the right to be heard `is withoutmeaning unless such notice of the pendency of a hearing or proceeding is adequate in the circumstances to safeguard the right.'" Id. (quoting Cugini v. Chiaradio , 96 R.I. 120 , 125 , 189 A.2d 798 , 801 (1963)).	1	3
Walker v. City of Hutchinsongreen scotus · 1956 · cited in 1 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977 2 sentences 1977Schroeder v. City of New York, 371 U.S. 208, 212-13 , 83 S.Ct. 279, 282-83 , 9 L.Ed.2d 255, 259-60 (1962); Walker v. City of Hutchinson, 352 U.S. 112, 116 , 77 S.Ct. 200, 202 , 1 L.Ed.2d 178, 182 (1956); Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., supra at 318-19, 70 S.Ct. at 659-60 , 94 L.Ed. at 875-76. 1977Schroeder v. City of New York, 371 U.S. 208, 212-13 , 83 S.Ct. 279, 282-83 , 9 L.Ed.2d 255, 259-60 (1962); Walker v. City of Hutchinson, 352 U.S. 112, 116 , 77 S.Ct. 200, 202 , 1 L.Ed.2d 178, 182 (1956); Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., supra at 318-19, 70 S.Ct. at 659-60 , 94 L.Ed. at 875-76.	1	1
Schroeder v. City of New Yorkgreen scotus · 1962 · cited in 1 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977 2 sentences 1977Schroeder v. City of New York, 371 U.S. 208, 212-13 , 83 S.Ct. 279, 282-83 , 9 L.Ed.2d 255, 259-60 (1962); Walker v. City of Hutchinson, 352 U.S. 112, 116 , 77 S.Ct. 200, 202 , 1 L.Ed.2d 178, 182 (1956); Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., supra at 318-19, 70 S.Ct. at 659-60 , 94 L.Ed. at 875-76. 1977Schroeder v. City of New York, 371 U.S. 208, 212-13 , 83 S.Ct. 279, 282-83 , 9 L.Ed.2d 255, 259-60 (1962); Walker v. City of Hutchinson, 352 U.S. 112, 116 , 77 S.Ct. 200, 202 , 1 L.Ed.2d 178, 182 (1956); Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., supra at 318-19, 70 S.Ct. at 659-60 , 94 L.Ed. at 875-76.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

Case	Cited	Years
Anderson National Bank v. Luckett green scotus · 1944 2 sentences 2001(Emphasis added.) In addition, the right to be heard “is without meaning unless such notice of the pendency of a hearing or proceeding is adequate in the circumstances to safeguard the right.” Cugini v. Chiaradio, 96 R.I. 120, 125 , 189 A.2d 798, 801 (1963) (citing Anderson National Bank v. Luckett, 321 U.S. 233 , 64 S.Ct. 599 , 88 L.Ed. 692 (1944)). 2001(Emphasis added.) In addition, the right to be heard “is without meaning unless such notice of the pendency of a hearing or proceeding is adequate in the circumstances to safeguard the right.” Cugini v. Chiaradio, 96 R.I. 120, 125 , 189 A.2d 798, 801 (1963) (citing Anderson National Bank v. Luckett, 321 U.S. 233 , 64 S.Ct. 599 , 88 L.Ed. 692 (1944)).	3	1963–2010
State v. Oliveira green ri · 2001 1 sentence 2007Additionally, "the right to be heard `is withoutmeaning unless such notice of the pendency of a hearing or proceeding is adequate in the circumstances to safeguard the right.'" Id. (quoting Cugini v. Chiaradio , 96 R.I. 120 , 125 , 189 A.2d 798 , 801 (1963)).	1	2007–2007
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. green scotus · 1950 1 sentence 1977Schroeder v. City of New York, 371 U.S. 208, 212-13 , 83 S.Ct. 279, 282-83 , 9 L.Ed.2d 255, 259-60 (1962); Walker v. City of Hutchinson, 352 U.S. 112, 116 , 77 S.Ct. 200, 202 , 1 L.Ed.2d 178, 182 (1956); Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., supra at 318-19, 70 S.Ct. at 659-60 , 94 L.Ed. at 875-76.	1	1977–1977
Mello v. Board of Review of Newport green ri · 1962 2 sentences 1970I. 43, 177 A.2d 533 , contending that in that case we held that the provisions of §45-24-18 1 relating to the giving of the public notice of the pendency of a hearing of an appeal are jurisdictional “* * * and that the acquisition of jurisdiction to hear and determine such applications depends on strict compliance therewith.” Id. at 49, 177 A.2d at 536 . 1970I. 43, 177 A.2d 533 , contending that in that case we held that the provisions of §45-24-18 1 relating to the giving of the public notice of the pendency of a hearing of an appeal are jurisdictional “* * * and that the acquisition of jurisdiction to hear and determine such applications depends on strict compliance therewith.” Id. at 49, 177 A.2d at 536 .	1	1970–1970

Where else courts name it

PA 55 (1903–2024) NY 20 (1917–2026) GA 18 (1901–2019) CA 12 (1984–2016) NJ 10 (1981–2023) IL 10 (1928–2024) WI 8 (2004–2025) RI 6 (1963–2010) FL 6 (1932–2022) AL 5 (2002–2004) CT 5 (1987–2018) WA 4 (2007–2018) OH 4 (1913–2010) MI 4 (1985–2017) MD 4 (1977–2025) KY 3 (1994–2023) KS 3 (1983–2001) MA 3 (1936–2011) TN 3 (2017–2017) NE 3 (1908–2023) WV 3 (1951–1980) IN 2 (1873–2010) CO 2 (1961–2010) LA 2 (1935–1997) OR 2 (1999–2022)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check