Anderson motion in South Carolina

2026See Wilder Corp. v. Wilke, 330 S.C. 71, 76 , 497 S.E.2d 731, 733 (1998) ("It is axiomatic that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court] to be preserved for appellate review.").

2026See Wilder Corp. v. Wilke, 330 S.C. 71, 76 , 497 S.E.2d 731, 733 (1998) ("It is axiomatic that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court] to be preserved for appellate review.").

2024See Osborne, 335 S.C. at 180 , 516 S.E.2d at 205 ("If there is any evidence tending to establish the corpus delicti, then it is the trial court's duty to pass that question on to the jury.").

2024See Osborne, 335 S.C. at 180 , 516 S.E.2d at 205 ("If there is any evidence tending to establish the corpus delicti, then it is the trial court's duty to pass that question on to the jury.").

2021See State v. Culbreath, 377 S.C. 326, 331 , 659 S.E.2d 268, 271 (Ct. App. 2008) ("Whether to grant or deny a mistrial motion is a matter within the trial court's sound discretion, and the court's decision will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion amounting to an error of law."); State v. Council, 335 S.C. 1, 13 , 515 S.E.2d 508, 514 (1999) (stating a mistrial should be declared only when necessary and requires a defendant to show both error and resulting prejudice); State v. Herring, 387 S.C. 201, 216 , 692 S.E.2d 490, 498 (2009) ("The grant of a motion for a mistrial is an

2021See State v. Culbreath, 377 S.C. 326, 331 , 659 S.E.2d 268, 271 (Ct. App. 2008) ("Whether to grant or deny a mistrial motion is a matter within the trial court's sound discretion, and the court's decision will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion amounting to an error of law."); State v. Council, 335 S.C. 1, 13 , 515 S.E.2d 508, 514 (1999) (stating a mistrial should be declared only when necessary and requires a defendant to show both error and resulting prejudice); State v. Herring, 387 S.C. 201, 216 , 692 S.E.2d 490, 498 (2009) ("The grant of a motion for a mistrial is an

2021See State v. Culbreath, 377 S.C. 326, 331 , 659 S.E.2d 268, 271 (Ct. App. 2008) ("Whether to grant or deny a mistrial motion is a matter within the trial court's sound discretion, and the court's decision will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion amounting to an error of law."); State v. Council, 335 S.C. 1, 13 , 515 S.E.2d 508, 514 (1999) (stating a mistrial should be declared only when necessary and requires a defendant to show both error and resulting prejudice); State v. Herring, 387 S.C. 201, 216 , 692 S.E.2d 490, 498 (2009) ("The grant of a motion for a mistrial is an

2021See State v. Culbreath, 377 S.C. 326, 331 , 659 S.E.2d 268, 271 (Ct. App. 2008) ("Whether to grant or deny a mistrial motion is a matter within the trial court's sound discretion, and the court's decision will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion amounting to an error of law."); State v. Council, 335 S.C. 1, 13 , 515 S.E.2d 508, 514 (1999) (stating a mistrial should be declared only when necessary and requires a defendant to show both error and resulting prejudice); State v. Herring, 387 S.C. 201, 216 , 692 S.E.2d 490, 498 (2009) ("The grant of a motion for a mistrial is an

2021See State v. Culbreath, 377 S.C. 326, 331 , 659 S.E.2d 268, 271 (Ct. App. 2008) ("Whether to grant or deny a mistrial motion is a matter within the trial court's sound discretion, and the court's decision will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion amounting to an error of law."); State v. Council, 335 S.C. 1, 13 , 515 S.E.2d 508, 514 (1999) (stating a mistrial should be declared only when necessary and requires a defendant to show both error and resulting prejudice); State v. Herring, 387 S.C. 201, 216 , 692 S.E.2d 490, 498 (2009) ("The grant of a motion for a mistrial is an

2021See State v. Culbreath, 377 S.C. 326, 331 , 659 S.E.2d 268, 271 (Ct. App. 2008) ("Whether to grant or deny a mistrial motion is a matter within the trial court's sound discretion, and the court's decision will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion amounting to an error of law."); State v. Council, 335 S.C. 1, 13 , 515 S.E.2d 508, 514 (1999) (stating a mistrial should be declared only when necessary and requires a defendant to show both error and resulting prejudice); State v. Herring, 387 S.C. 201, 216 , 692 S.E.2d 490, 498 (2009) ("The grant of a motion for a mistrial is an

2011See Dunbar , 356 S.C. at 142 , 587 S.E.2d at 693 ("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge.").

2011See Dunbar , 356 S.C. at 142 , 587 S.E.2d at 693 ("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge.").