election of remedies involves a choice doctrine (South Carolina) · Go Syfert
← South Carolina issues

election of remedies involves a choice doctrine in South Carolina

6 South Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1985–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Brown v. Felkelgreen
scctapp · 1995 · cited in 2 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2006–2024
2 sentences

2024See Brown v. Felkel, 320 S.C. 292, 294 , 465 S.E.2d 93, 95 (Ct. App. 1995) ("The doctrine of election of remedies involves a choice between two or more different and coexisting modes of procedure and relief afforded by law for the same injury."); id. ("Its purpose is to prevent double redress for a single wrong."); id. ("When one set of facts entitles the plaintiff to alternative remedies, he may plead and prove his entitlement to either or both; however, the plaintiff may not recover both."); id. ("The invocation of one remedy constitutes an election of remedies that will bar another remedy c

2024See Brown v. Felkel, 320 S.C. 292, 294 , 465 S.E.2d 93, 95 (Ct. App. 1995) ("The doctrine of election of remedies involves a choice between two or more different and coexisting modes of procedure and relief afforded by law for the same injury."); id. ("Its purpose is to prevent double redress for a single wrong."); id. ("When one set of facts entitles the plaintiff to alternative remedies, he may plead and prove his entitlement to either or both; however, the plaintiff may not recover both."); id. ("The invocation of one remedy constitutes an election of remedies that will bar another remedy c

12
Williams v. Riedmangreen
scctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006Taylor v. Medenica, 324 S.C. 200 , 479 S.E.2d 35 (1996); Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Cowart v. Poore, 337 S.C. 359 , 523 S.E.2d 182 (Ct.App.1999); Brown v. Felkel, 320 S.C. 292 , 465 S.E.2d 93 (Ct.App.1995); Jones v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc., 318 S.C. 171 , 456 S.E.2d 429 (Ct.App.1995); Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 303 S.C. 10 , 397 S.E.2d 774 (Ct.App.1990); see also Williams v. Riedman, 339 S.C. 251 , 529 S.E.2d 28 (Ct.App.2000) (noting that election of remedies involves a choice between different forms of redress afforded by law for the sam

2006Taylor v. Medenica, 324 S.C. 200 , 479 S.E.2d 35 (1996); Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Cowart v. Poore, 337 S.C. 359 , 523 S.E.2d 182 (Ct.App.1999); Brown v. Felkel, 320 S.C. 292 , 465 S.E.2d 93 (Ct.App.1995); Jones v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc., 318 S.C. 171 , 456 S.E.2d 429 (Ct.App.1995); Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 303 S.C. 10 , 397 S.E.2d 774 (Ct.App.1990); see also Williams v. Riedman, 339 S.C. 251 , 529 S.E.2d 28 (Ct.App.2000) (noting that election of remedies involves a choice between different forms of redress afforded by law for the sam

11
Save Charleston Foundation v. Murraygreen
scctapp · 1985 · cited in 1 South Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996See Save Charleston Foundation v. Murray, 286 S.C. 170 , 333 S.E. (2d) 60 (Ct. App. 1985) (doctrine of election of remedies involves a choice between two or more different and coexisting modes of procedure and relief afforded by law for the same injury; plaintiff may plead and prove either or both but must elect so as not to receive a double recovery).

1996See Save Charleston Foundation v. Murray, 286 S.C. 170 , 333 S.E. (2d) 60 (Ct. App. 1985) (doctrine of election of remedies involves a choice between two or more different and coexisting modes of procedure and relief afforded by law for the same injury; plaintiff may plead and prove either or both but must elect so as not to receive a double recovery).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas green
sc · 1945
2 sentences

2006Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Walker v. McDonald, 136 S.C. 231 , 134 S.E. 222 (1926); Boardman v. Lovett Enterprises, Inc., 283 S.C. 425 , 323 S.E.2d 784 (Ct.App.1984).

2006Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Walker v. McDonald, 136 S.C. 231 , 134 S.E. 222 (1926); Boardman v. Lovett Enterprises, Inc., 283 S.C. 425 , 323 S.E.2d 784 (Ct.App.1984).

41985–2006
Walker v. McDonald green
sc · 1926
2 sentences

2006Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Walker v. McDonald, 136 S.C. 231 , 134 S.E. 222 (1926); Boardman v. Lovett Enterprises, Inc., 283 S.C. 425 , 323 S.E.2d 784 (Ct.App.1984).

2006Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Walker v. McDonald, 136 S.C. 231 , 134 S.E. 222 (1926); Boardman v. Lovett Enterprises, Inc., 283 S.C. 425 , 323 S.E.2d 784 (Ct.App.1984).

21985–2006
Boardman v. Lovett Enterprises, Inc. green
scctapp · 1984
2 sentences

2006Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Walker v. McDonald, 136 S.C. 231 , 134 S.E. 222 (1926); Boardman v. Lovett Enterprises, Inc., 283 S.C. 425 , 323 S.E.2d 784 (Ct.App.1984).

2006Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Walker v. McDonald, 136 S.C. 231 , 134 S.E. 222 (1926); Boardman v. Lovett Enterprises, Inc., 283 S.C. 425 , 323 S.E.2d 784 (Ct.App.1984).

21985–2006
Taylor v. Medenica green
sc · 1996
2 sentences

2006Taylor v. Medenica, 324 S.C. 200 , 479 S.E.2d 35 (1996); Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Cowart v. Poore, 337 S.C. 359 , 523 S.E.2d 182 (Ct.App.1999); Brown v. Felkel, 320 S.C. 292 , 465 S.E.2d 93 (Ct.App.1995); Jones v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc., 318 S.C. 171 , 456 S.E.2d 429 (Ct.App.1995); Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 303 S.C. 10 , 397 S.E.2d 774 (Ct.App.1990); see also Williams v. Riedman, 339 S.C. 251 , 529 S.E.2d 28 (Ct.App.2000) (noting that election of remedies involves a choice between different forms of redress afforded by law for the sam

2006Taylor v. Medenica, 324 S.C. 200 , 479 S.E.2d 35 (1996); Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Cowart v. Poore, 337 S.C. 359 , 523 S.E.2d 182 (Ct.App.1999); Brown v. Felkel, 320 S.C. 292 , 465 S.E.2d 93 (Ct.App.1995); Jones v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc., 318 S.C. 171 , 456 S.E.2d 429 (Ct.App.1995); Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 303 S.C. 10 , 397 S.E.2d 774 (Ct.App.1990); see also Williams v. Riedman, 339 S.C. 251 , 529 S.E.2d 28 (Ct.App.2000) (noting that election of remedies involves a choice between different forms of redress afforded by law for the sam

12006–2006
Cowart v. Poore green
scctapp · 1999
2 sentences

2006Taylor v. Medenica, 324 S.C. 200 , 479 S.E.2d 35 (1996); Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Cowart v. Poore, 337 S.C. 359 , 523 S.E.2d 182 (Ct.App.1999); Brown v. Felkel, 320 S.C. 292 , 465 S.E.2d 93 (Ct.App.1995); Jones v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc., 318 S.C. 171 , 456 S.E.2d 429 (Ct.App.1995); Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 303 S.C. 10 , 397 S.E.2d 774 (Ct.App.1990); see also Williams v. Riedman, 339 S.C. 251 , 529 S.E.2d 28 (Ct.App.2000) (noting that election of remedies involves a choice between different forms of redress afforded by law for the sam

2006Taylor v. Medenica, 324 S.C. 200 , 479 S.E.2d 35 (1996); Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Cowart v. Poore, 337 S.C. 359 , 523 S.E.2d 182 (Ct.App.1999); Brown v. Felkel, 320 S.C. 292 , 465 S.E.2d 93 (Ct.App.1995); Jones v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc., 318 S.C. 171 , 456 S.E.2d 429 (Ct.App.1995); Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 303 S.C. 10 , 397 S.E.2d 774 (Ct.App.1990); see also Williams v. Riedman, 339 S.C. 251 , 529 S.E.2d 28 (Ct.App.2000) (noting that election of remedies involves a choice between different forms of redress afforded by law for the sam

12006–2006
Jones v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc. green
scctapp · 1995
2 sentences

2006Taylor v. Medenica, 324 S.C. 200 , 479 S.E.2d 35 (1996); Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Cowart v. Poore, 337 S.C. 359 , 523 S.E.2d 182 (Ct.App.1999); Brown v. Felkel, 320 S.C. 292 , 465 S.E.2d 93 (Ct.App.1995); Jones v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc., 318 S.C. 171 , 456 S.E.2d 429 (Ct.App.1995); Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 303 S.C. 10 , 397 S.E.2d 774 (Ct.App.1990); see also Williams v. Riedman, 339 S.C. 251 , 529 S.E.2d 28 (Ct.App.2000) (noting that election of remedies involves a choice between different forms of redress afforded by law for the sam

2006Taylor v. Medenica, 324 S.C. 200 , 479 S.E.2d 35 (1996); Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Cowart v. Poore, 337 S.C. 359 , 523 S.E.2d 182 (Ct.App.1999); Brown v. Felkel, 320 S.C. 292 , 465 S.E.2d 93 (Ct.App.1995); Jones v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc., 318 S.C. 171 , 456 S.E.2d 429 (Ct.App.1995); Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 303 S.C. 10 , 397 S.E.2d 774 (Ct.App.1990); see also Williams v. Riedman, 339 S.C. 251 , 529 S.E.2d 28 (Ct.App.2000) (noting that election of remedies involves a choice between different forms of redress afforded by law for the sam

12006–2006
Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. green
scctapp · 1990
2 sentences

2006Taylor v. Medenica, 324 S.C. 200 , 479 S.E.2d 35 (1996); Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Cowart v. Poore, 337 S.C. 359 , 523 S.E.2d 182 (Ct.App.1999); Brown v. Felkel, 320 S.C. 292 , 465 S.E.2d 93 (Ct.App.1995); Jones v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc., 318 S.C. 171 , 456 S.E.2d 429 (Ct.App.1995); Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 303 S.C. 10 , 397 S.E.2d 774 (Ct.App.1990); see also Williams v. Riedman, 339 S.C. 251 , 529 S.E.2d 28 (Ct.App.2000) (noting that election of remedies involves a choice between different forms of redress afforded by law for the sam

2006Taylor v. Medenica, 324 S.C. 200 , 479 S.E.2d 35 (1996); Tzouvelekas v. Tzouvelekas, 206 S.C. 90 , 33 S.E.2d 73 (1945); Cowart v. Poore, 337 S.C. 359 , 523 S.E.2d 182 (Ct.App.1999); Brown v. Felkel, 320 S.C. 292 , 465 S.E.2d 93 (Ct.App.1995); Jones v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc., 318 S.C. 171 , 456 S.E.2d 429 (Ct.App.1995); Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc., 303 S.C. 10 , 397 S.E.2d 774 (Ct.App.1990); see also Williams v. Riedman, 339 S.C. 251 , 529 S.E.2d 28 (Ct.App.2000) (noting that election of remedies involves a choice between different forms of redress afforded by law for the sam

12006–2006

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check