Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 South Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 2014–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Watson v. Underwoodgreen2 sentences2025"The denial of a motion for summary judgment is not appealable because it does not finally determine anything about the merits or strike a defense." Watson v. Underwood, 407 S.C. 443, 453 , 756 S.E.2d 155, 160 (Ct. App. 2014). 2025"The denial of a motion for summary judgment is not appealable because it does not finally determine anything about the merits or strike a defense." Watson v. Underwood, 407 S.C. 443, 453 , 756 S.E.2d 155, 160 (Ct. App. 2014). | 4 | 4 |
Ballenger v. Bowengreen2 sentences2018See Ballenger v. Bowen, 313 S.C. 476, 476 , 443 S.E.2d 379 , 380 (1994) ("This [c]ourt has repeatedly held that the denial of summary judgment is not directly appealable."); Watson v. Underwood, 407 S.C. 443, 453 , 756 S.E.2d 155, 160 (Ct. App. 2014) ("The denial of a motion for summary judgment is not appealable because it does not finally determine anything about the merits or strike a defense."); id. at 457 , 756 S.E.2d at 163 ("Because the denial of a motion for summary judgment cannot be appealed, we cannot consider this issue."). 2. 2018See Ballenger v. Bowen, 313 S.C. 476, 476 , 443 S.E.2d 379 , 380 (1994) ("This [c]ourt has repeatedly held that the denial of summary judgment is not directly appealable."); Watson v. Underwood, 407 S.C. 443, 453 , 756 S.E.2d 155, 160 (Ct. App. 2014) ("The denial of a motion for summary judgment is not appealable because it does not finally determine anything about the merits or strike a defense."); id. at 457 , 756 S.E.2d at 163 ("Because the denial of a motion for summary judgment cannot be appealed, we cannot consider this issue."). 2. | 3 | 4 |
Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc.green2 sentences2015See Ballenger v. Bowen, 313 S.C. 476, 477 , 443 S.E.2d 379, 380 (1994) (explaining that the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not immediately appealable because it does not finally determine anything about the merits or strike a defense); Kinard v. Richardson, 407 S.C. 247, 263-64 , 754 S.E.2d 888, 897 (Ct.App.2014) (“[T]he denial of a motion for summary judgment is not appealable, even after final judgment.” (quoting Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc., 354 S.C. 161, 168 , 580 S.E.2d 440, 444 (2003))). 9 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we hold the circuit court properly fo 2015See Ballenger v. Bowen, 313 S.C. 476, 477 , 443 S.E.2d 379, 380 (1994) (explaining that the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not immediately appealable because it does not finally determine anything about the merits or strike a defense); Kinard v. Richardson, 407 S.C. 247, 263-64 , 754 S.E.2d 888, 897 (Ct.App.2014) (“[T]he denial of a motion for summary judgment is not appealable, even after final judgment.” (quoting Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc., 354 S.C. 161, 168 , 580 S.E.2d 440, 444 (2003))). 9 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we hold the circuit court properly fo | 1 | 1 |
Kinard v. Richardsongreen2 sentences2015See Ballenger v. Bowen, 313 S.C. 476, 477 , 443 S.E.2d 379, 380 (1994) (explaining that the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not immediately appealable because it does not finally determine anything about the merits or strike a defense); Kinard v. Richardson, 407 S.C. 247, 263-64 , 754 S.E.2d 888, 897 (Ct.App.2014) (“[T]he denial of a motion for summary judgment is not appealable, even after final judgment.” (quoting Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc., 354 S.C. 161, 168 , 580 S.E.2d 440, 444 (2003))). 9 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we hold the circuit court properly fo 2015See Ballenger v. Bowen, 313 S.C. 476, 477 , 443 S.E.2d 379, 380 (1994) (explaining that the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not immediately appealable because it does not finally determine anything about the merits or strike a defense); Kinard v. Richardson, 407 S.C. 247, 263-64 , 754 S.E.2d 888, 897 (Ct.App.2014) (“[T]he denial of a motion for summary judgment is not appealable, even after final judgment.” (quoting Olson v. Faculty House of Carolina, Inc., 354 S.C. 161, 168 , 580 S.E.2d 440, 444 (2003))). 9 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, we hold the circuit court properly fo | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||