Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Liberty Builders, Inc. v. Horton Ex Rel. Estate of Hortongreen2 sentences2022See Rhodes v. Benson Chrysler– Plymouth, Inc., 374 S.C. 122, 125-26 , 647 S.E.2d 249, 250-51 (Ct. App. 2007) ("[D]etermining whether a party waived its right to arbitrate is a legal conclusion subject to de novo review; nevertheless, the circuit [court's] factual findings underlying that conclusion will not be overruled if there is any evidence reasonably supporting them." (quoting Liberty Builders, Inc. v. Horton, 336 S.C. 658, 664-65 , 521 S.E.2d 749, 753 (Ct. App. 1999))); Johnson v. Heritage Healthcare of Estill, LLC, 416 S.C. 508, 513 , 788 S.E.2d 216, 218 (2016) ("The party seeking to es 2022See Rhodes v. Benson Chrysler– Plymouth, Inc., 374 S.C. 122, 125-26 , 647 S.E.2d 249, 250-51 (Ct. App. 2007) ("[D]etermining whether a party waived its right to arbitrate is a legal conclusion subject to de novo review; nevertheless, the circuit [court's] factual findings underlying that conclusion will not be overruled if there is any evidence reasonably supporting them." (quoting Liberty Builders, Inc. v. Horton, 336 S.C. 658, 664-65 , 521 S.E.2d 749, 753 (Ct. App. 1999))); Johnson v. Heritage Healthcare of Estill, LLC, 416 S.C. 508, 513 , 788 S.E.2d 216, 218 (2016) ("The party seeking to es | 2 | 2 |
General Equipment & Supply Co. v. Keller Rigging & Construction, SC, Inc.green2 sentences2022Equip. & Supply Co. v. Keller Rigging & Constr., S.C., Inc., 344 S.C. 553, 556 , 544 S.E.2d 643, 645 (Ct. App. 2001))). 2022Equip. & Supply Co. v. Keller Rigging & Constr., S.C., Inc., 344 S.C. 553, 556 , 544 S.E.2d 643, 645 (Ct. App. 2001))). | 1 | 2 |
Sentry Engineering & Construction, Inc. v. Mariner's Cay Development Corp.green2 sentences2003Corp., 287 S.C. 346, 351 , 338 S.E.2d 631, 634 (1985) (finding that “[flederal decisions require a showing of prejudice when waiver is asserted .... it is not inconsistency, but the presence or absence of prejudice which is determinative”); Evans v. Accent Manufactured Homes, Inc., 352 S.C. 544, 550 , 575 S.E.2d 74, 76 (Ct.App.2003) (“A party seeking to establish waiver must show prejudice through an undue burden caused by delay in demanding arbitration.”); Liberty Builders, 336 S.C. at 666 , 521 S.E.2d at 753 (holding same). 2003Corp., 287 S.C. 346, 351 , 338 S.E.2d 631, 634 (1985) (finding that “[flederal decisions require a showing of prejudice when waiver is asserted .... it is not inconsistency, but the presence or absence of prejudice which is determinative”); Evans v. Accent Manufactured Homes, Inc., 352 S.C. 544, 550 , 575 S.E.2d 74, 76 (Ct.App.2003) (“A party seeking to establish waiver must show prejudice through an undue burden caused by delay in demanding arbitration.”); Liberty Builders, 336 S.C. at 666 , 521 S.E.2d at 753 (holding same). | 1 | 2 |
Jenkins v. Refuge Temple Church of God in Christ, Inc.green2 sentences2023"The party seeking to establish waiver or laches has the burden of proof." Jenkins v. Refuge Temple Church of God in Christ, Inc., 424 S.C. 320, 334 , 818 S.E.2d 13, 20 (Ct. App. 2018). 2023"The party seeking to establish waiver or laches has the burden of proof." Jenkins v. Refuge Temple Church of God in Christ, Inc., 424 S.C. 320, 334 , 818 S.E.2d 13, 20 (Ct. App. 2018). | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Stokesgreen2 sentences2023"The failure to assert a right 'does not come into existence until there is a reason or situation that demands assertion.'" Mid-State Tr., II v. Wright, 323 S.C. 303, 307 , 474 S.E.2d 421, 423 (1996) (quoting Ex parte Stokes, 256 S.C. 260, 266 , 182 S.E.2d 306, 309 (1971)). 2023"The failure to assert a right 'does not come into existence until there is a reason or situation that demands assertion.'" Mid-State Tr., II v. Wright, 323 S.C. 303, 307 , 474 S.E.2d 421, 423 (1996) (quoting Ex parte Stokes, 256 S.C. 260, 266 , 182 S.E.2d 306, 309 (1971)). | 1 | 1 |
Mid-State Trust, II v. Wrightgreen2 sentences2023"The failure to assert a right 'does not come into existence until there is a reason or situation that demands assertion.'" Mid-State Tr., II v. Wright, 323 S.C. 303, 307 , 474 S.E.2d 421, 423 (1996) (quoting Ex parte Stokes, 256 S.C. 260, 266 , 182 S.E.2d 306, 309 (1971)). 2023"The failure to assert a right 'does not come into existence until there is a reason or situation that demands assertion.'" Mid-State Tr., II v. Wright, 323 S.C. 303, 307 , 474 S.E.2d 421, 423 (1996) (quoting Ex parte Stokes, 256 S.C. 260, 266 , 182 S.E.2d 306, 309 (1971)). | 1 | 1 |
Rhodes v. Benson Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.green2 sentences2022See Rhodes v. Benson Chrysler– Plymouth, Inc., 374 S.C. 122, 125-26 , 647 S.E.2d 249, 250-51 (Ct. App. 2007) ("[D]etermining whether a party waived its right to arbitrate is a legal conclusion subject to de novo review; nevertheless, the circuit [court's] factual findings underlying that conclusion will not be overruled if there is any evidence reasonably supporting them." (quoting Liberty Builders, Inc. v. Horton, 336 S.C. 658, 664-65 , 521 S.E.2d 749, 753 (Ct. App. 1999))); Johnson v. Heritage Healthcare of Estill, LLC, 416 S.C. 508, 513 , 788 S.E.2d 216, 218 (2016) ("The party seeking to es 2022See Rhodes v. Benson Chrysler– Plymouth, Inc., 374 S.C. 122, 125-26 , 647 S.E.2d 249, 250-51 (Ct. App. 2007) ("[D]etermining whether a party waived its right to arbitrate is a legal conclusion subject to de novo review; nevertheless, the circuit [court's] factual findings underlying that conclusion will not be overruled if there is any evidence reasonably supporting them." (quoting Liberty Builders, Inc. v. Horton, 336 S.C. 658, 664-65 , 521 S.E.2d 749, 753 (Ct. App. 1999))); Johnson v. Heritage Healthcare of Estill, LLC, 416 S.C. 508, 513 , 788 S.E.2d 216, 218 (2016) ("The party seeking to es | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Heritage Healthcare of Estill, LLCgreen2 sentences2022See Rhodes v. Benson Chrysler– Plymouth, Inc., 374 S.C. 122, 125-26 , 647 S.E.2d 249, 250-51 (Ct. App. 2007) ("[D]etermining whether a party waived its right to arbitrate is a legal conclusion subject to de novo review; nevertheless, the circuit [court's] factual findings underlying that conclusion will not be overruled if there is any evidence reasonably supporting them." (quoting Liberty Builders, Inc. v. Horton, 336 S.C. 658, 664-65 , 521 S.E.2d 749, 753 (Ct. App. 1999))); Johnson v. Heritage Healthcare of Estill, LLC, 416 S.C. 508, 513 , 788 S.E.2d 216, 218 (2016) ("The party seeking to es 2022See Rhodes v. Benson Chrysler– Plymouth, Inc., 374 S.C. 122, 125-26 , 647 S.E.2d 249, 250-51 (Ct. App. 2007) ("[D]etermining whether a party waived its right to arbitrate is a legal conclusion subject to de novo review; nevertheless, the circuit [court's] factual findings underlying that conclusion will not be overruled if there is any evidence reasonably supporting them." (quoting Liberty Builders, Inc. v. Horton, 336 S.C. 658, 664-65 , 521 S.E.2d 749, 753 (Ct. App. 1999))); Johnson v. Heritage Healthcare of Estill, LLC, 416 S.C. 508, 513 , 788 S.E.2d 216, 218 (2016) ("The party seeking to es | 1 | 1 |
Spur at Williams Brice Owners Ass'n v. Lallagreen2 sentences2018See SPUR at Williams Brice Owners Ass'n v. Lalla , 415 S.C. 72 , 91, 781 S.E.2d 115 , 125 (Ct. App. 2015) ; King v. James , 388 S.C. 16 , 28, 694 S.E.2d 35 , 41 (Ct. App. 2010). 2018See SPUR at Williams Brice Owners Ass'n v. Lalla , 415 S.C. 72 , 91, 781 S.E.2d 115 , 125 (Ct. App. 2015) ; King v. James , 388 S.C. 16 , 28, 694 S.E.2d 35 , 41 (Ct. App. 2010). | 1 | 1 |
Evans v. Accent Manufactured Homes, Inc.green2 sentences2003Corp., 287 S.C. 346, 351 , 338 S.E.2d 631, 634 (1985) (finding that “[flederal decisions require a showing of prejudice when waiver is asserted .... it is not inconsistency, but the presence or absence of prejudice which is determinative”); Evans v. Accent Manufactured Homes, Inc., 352 S.C. 544, 550 , 575 S.E.2d 74, 76 (Ct.App.2003) (“A party seeking to establish waiver must show prejudice through an undue burden caused by delay in demanding arbitration.”); Liberty Builders, 336 S.C. at 666 , 521 S.E.2d at 753 (holding same). 2003Corp., 287 S.C. 346, 351 , 338 S.E.2d 631, 634 (1985) (finding that “[flederal decisions require a showing of prejudice when waiver is asserted .... it is not inconsistency, but the presence or absence of prejudice which is determinative”); Evans v. Accent Manufactured Homes, Inc., 352 S.C. 544, 550 , 575 S.E.2d 74, 76 (Ct.App.2003) (“A party seeking to establish waiver must show prejudice through an undue burden caused by delay in demanding arbitration.”); Liberty Builders, 336 S.C. at 666 , 521 S.E.2d at 753 (holding same). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hyload, Inc. v. Pre-Engineered Products, Inc.green2 sentences2003But see Hyload, Inc. v. Pre-Engineered Prods., Inc., 308 S.C. 277, 280 , 417 S.E.2d 622, 624 (Ct.App.1992) (holding that appellant “waived its right to compel arbitration under the contract by refusing to execute the papers necessary to commence arbitration and electing instead to sue on the contract,” thus finding that “[tjhis is simply a particular instance of the general rule that acts inconsistent with the continued assertion of a right may constitute waiver”). 2003But see Hyload, Inc. v. Pre-Engineered Prods., Inc., 308 S.C. 277, 280 , 417 S.E.2d 622, 624 (Ct.App.1992) (holding that appellant “waived its right to compel arbitration under the contract by refusing to execute the papers necessary to commence arbitration and electing instead to sue on the contract,” thus finding that “[tjhis is simply a particular instance of the general rule that acts inconsistent with the continued assertion of a right may constitute waiver”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
King v. James
green
2 sentences2018See SPUR at Williams Brice Owners Ass'n v. Lalla , 415 S.C. 72 , 91, 781 S.E.2d 115 , 125 (Ct. App. 2015) ; King v. James , 388 S.C. 16 , 28, 694 S.E.2d 35 , 41 (Ct. App. 2010). 2018See SPUR at Williams Brice Owners Ass'n v. Lalla , 415 S.C. 72 , 91, 781 S.E.2d 115 , 125 (Ct. App. 2015) ; King v. James , 388 S.C. 16 , 28, 694 S.E.2d 35 , 41 (Ct. App. 2010). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,231 William C. Fraser v. Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. Franklyn C. Shulman Allan G. Kenzie
green
1 sentence2003However, delay and the extent of the moving party’s trial-oriented activity are material factors in assessing a plea of prejudice.” MicroStrategy, 268 F.3d at 249 (quoting Fraser, 817 F.2d at 252 ). *72 The party seeking to establish waiver has the burden of showing prejudice. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
cluster 775216
green
1 sentence2003However, delay and the extent of the moving party’s trial-oriented activity are material factors in assessing a plea of prejudice.” MicroStrategy, 268 F.3d at 249 (quoting Fraser, 817 F.2d at 252 ). *72 The party seeking to establish waiver has the burden of showing prejudice. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.